Closed
Bug 852293
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
mozilla::css::OverflowChangedTracker::Flush hits SplayTree assertion
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Core
Layout
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: jruderman)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, testcase)
Attachments
(2 files)
Within a few seconds, the testcase usually hits:
Assertion failure: Comparator::compare(*minimum, *node) < 0, at SplayTree.h:263
Why is this non-deterministic? Can this kind of bug be made deterministic, perhaps by adding more assertions? (The non-determinism caused me to spend several hours massaging the testcase instead of several minutes simply reducing it.)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Might this have started as a result of the patch to bug 849263? I still think that patch is right, though.
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to David Baron [:dbaron] (don't cc:, use needinfo? instead) from comment #2)
> Might this have started as a result of the patch to bug 849263? I still
> think that patch is right, though.
I believe so, yes. This appears to be a different symptom of bug 850672.
Thanks for the testcase Jesse!
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•13 years ago
|
||
Makes sense. The non-determinism might come from [whether and when the presarena reuses a memory address]. This particular SplayTree cares whether frame pointers are reused because its entries are sorted by by depth and then frame pointer.
Comment 5•13 years ago
|
||
WFM in local m-c debug build on Linux64 and OSX.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite?
OS: Mac OS X → All
Hardware: x86_64 → All
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 7•13 years ago
|
||
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite+
Comment 8•13 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → jruderman
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•