Closed Bug 854820 Opened 13 years ago Closed 13 years ago

crash in nsDisplayOpacity::GetType with AMD Radeon HD 6290/6310/6320/6470/7310/7340

Categories

(Core :: Layout, defect)

21 Branch
x86
Windows 7
defect
Not set
critical

Tracking

()

RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Tracking Status
firefox20 --- unaffected
firefox21 --- affected
firefox22 --- unaffected

People

(Reporter: scoobidiver, Unassigned)

References

Details

(Keywords: crash, regression, topcrash)

Crash Data

It first showed up in 21.0a2/20130325 and is already #5 top browser crasher in 21.0a2. In case it has a meaning, the regression range is: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/pushloghtml?fromchange=749b9043312b&tochange=286f3ec182e8 Bug 714320 which is the same kind of crashes started in 22.0a1/20130325105600. Its regression range is: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=3acbf951b3b1&tochange=4d3250f3afea There are no patches in common. Signature nsDisplayOpacity::GetType() More Reports Search UUID 7ac53e7c-e270-4623-98ea-4687a2130326 Date Processed 2013-03-26 07:48:09 Uptime 542 Last Crash 1.4 hours before submission Install Age 7.0 hours since version was first installed. Install Time 2013-03-26 00:46:09 Product Firefox Version 21.0a2 Build ID 20130325042013 Release Channel aurora OS Windows NT OS Version 6.2.9200 Build Architecture x86 Build Architecture Info AuthenticAMD family 20 model 2 stepping 0 Crash Reason EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_WRITE Crash Address 0x6f0a82c6 App Notes AdapterVendorID: 0x1002, AdapterDeviceID: 0x9809, AdapterSubsysID: 397f17aa, AdapterDriverVersion: 8.982.6.0 D3D10 Layers? D3D10 Layers- D3D9 Layers? D3D9 Layers+ Processor Notes sp-processor01.phx1.mozilla.com_5314:2008 EMCheckCompatibility True Adapter Vendor ID 0x1002 Adapter Device ID 0x9809 Total Virtual Memory 4294836224 Available Virtual Memory 3684122624 System Memory Use Percentage 53 Available Page File 2359279616 Available Physical Memory 784797696 Frame Module Signature Source 0 xul.dll nsDisplayOpacity::GetType layout/base/nsDisplayList.h:2297 1 xul.dll mozilla::FrameLayerBuilder::AddThebesDisplayItem layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:2422 2 xul.dll mozilla::`anonymous namespace'::ContainerState::ProcessDisplayItems layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:2245 3 mozalloc.dll moz_xrealloc memory/mozalloc/mozalloc.cpp:86 4 xul.dll mozilla::`anonymous namespace'::ContainerState::ProcessDisplayItems layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:2084 5 xul.dll mozilla::`anonymous namespace'::ContainerState::ProcessDisplayItems layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:2084 6 xul.dll mozilla::`anonymous namespace'::ContainerState::ContainerState layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:264 7 kernel32.dll TlsFreeStub 8 @0xb7a6890 More reports at: https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=nsDisplayOpacity%3A%3AGetType%28%29
Keywords: topcrash
Milan/Benjamin - who would be in the best position to investigate? Sounds like this may be any combination of: A) Build-specific gfx tickling issue that coincidentally happened across FF22/21 on the same day B) An external driver change C) A recent change in FF21/22 B/C would likely need to combined, since FF20 is unaffected. For B, can we try to get a driver correlation and URLs KaiRo? I'd suggest against requesting internal QA to start the investigation, given how difficult these issues have been to reproduce
Flags: needinfo?(kairo)
Keywords: needURLs
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #1) > A) Build-specific gfx tickling issue that coincidentally happened across > FF22/21 on the same day It seems so because there are no crashes in 21.0a2/20130326 for this bug and in 22.0a1/20130326 for bug 714320. It is gone as quickly as it appeared.
(In reply to Scoobidiver from comment #2) > (In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #1) > > A) Build-specific gfx tickling issue that coincidentally happened across > > FF22/21 on the same day > It seems so In that case, no info needed from me. Also, getting driver correlations is really hard, I think bjacob known some good commands to get them if we really need them - and URLs aren't really interesting. A lot of Facebook, a bit of YouTube.
Flags: needinfo?(kairo)
Keywords: needURLs
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.