Closed
Bug 854820
Opened 13 years ago
Closed 13 years ago
crash in nsDisplayOpacity::GetType with AMD Radeon HD 6290/6310/6320/6470/7310/7340
Categories
(Core :: Layout, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INCOMPLETE
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox20 | --- | unaffected |
| firefox21 | --- | affected |
| firefox22 | --- | unaffected |
People
(Reporter: scoobidiver, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: crash, regression, topcrash)
Crash Data
It first showed up in 21.0a2/20130325 and is already #5 top browser crasher in 21.0a2. In case it has a meaning, the regression range is:
http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/pushloghtml?fromchange=749b9043312b&tochange=286f3ec182e8
Bug 714320 which is the same kind of crashes started in 22.0a1/20130325105600. Its regression range is:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=3acbf951b3b1&tochange=4d3250f3afea
There are no patches in common.
Signature nsDisplayOpacity::GetType() More Reports Search
UUID 7ac53e7c-e270-4623-98ea-4687a2130326
Date Processed 2013-03-26 07:48:09
Uptime 542
Last Crash 1.4 hours before submission
Install Age 7.0 hours since version was first installed.
Install Time 2013-03-26 00:46:09
Product Firefox
Version 21.0a2
Build ID 20130325042013
Release Channel aurora
OS Windows NT
OS Version 6.2.9200
Build Architecture x86
Build Architecture Info AuthenticAMD family 20 model 2 stepping 0
Crash Reason EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION_WRITE
Crash Address 0x6f0a82c6
App Notes
AdapterVendorID: 0x1002, AdapterDeviceID: 0x9809, AdapterSubsysID: 397f17aa, AdapterDriverVersion: 8.982.6.0
D3D10 Layers? D3D10 Layers- D3D9 Layers? D3D9 Layers+
Processor Notes sp-processor01.phx1.mozilla.com_5314:2008
EMCheckCompatibility True
Adapter Vendor ID 0x1002
Adapter Device ID 0x9809
Total Virtual Memory 4294836224
Available Virtual Memory 3684122624
System Memory Use Percentage 53
Available Page File 2359279616
Available Physical Memory 784797696
Frame Module Signature Source
0 xul.dll nsDisplayOpacity::GetType layout/base/nsDisplayList.h:2297
1 xul.dll mozilla::FrameLayerBuilder::AddThebesDisplayItem layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:2422
2 xul.dll mozilla::`anonymous namespace'::ContainerState::ProcessDisplayItems layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:2245
3 mozalloc.dll moz_xrealloc memory/mozalloc/mozalloc.cpp:86
4 xul.dll mozilla::`anonymous namespace'::ContainerState::ProcessDisplayItems layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:2084
5 xul.dll mozilla::`anonymous namespace'::ContainerState::ProcessDisplayItems layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:2084
6 xul.dll mozilla::`anonymous namespace'::ContainerState::ContainerState layout/base/FrameLayerBuilder.cpp:264
7 kernel32.dll TlsFreeStub
8 @0xb7a6890
More reports at:
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/list?signature=nsDisplayOpacity%3A%3AGetType%28%29
| Reporter | ||
Updated•13 years ago
|
tracking-firefox21:
--- → ?
Keywords: topcrash
Comment 1•13 years ago
|
||
Milan/Benjamin - who would be in the best position to investigate? Sounds like this may be any combination of:
A) Build-specific gfx tickling issue that coincidentally happened across FF22/21 on the same day
B) An external driver change
C) A recent change in FF21/22
B/C would likely need to combined, since FF20 is unaffected. For B, can we try to get a driver correlation and URLs KaiRo?
I'd suggest against requesting internal QA to start the investigation, given how difficult these issues have been to reproduce
Flags: needinfo?(kairo)
Keywords: needURLs
| Reporter | ||
Comment 2•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #1)
> A) Build-specific gfx tickling issue that coincidentally happened across
> FF22/21 on the same day
It seems so because there are no crashes in 21.0a2/20130326 for this bug and in 22.0a1/20130326 for bug 714320. It is gone as quickly as it appeared.
tracking-firefox21:
? → ---
Comment 3•13 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Scoobidiver from comment #2)
> (In reply to Alex Keybl [:akeybl] from comment #1)
> > A) Build-specific gfx tickling issue that coincidentally happened across
> > FF22/21 on the same day
> It seems so
In that case, no info needed from me. Also, getting driver correlations is really hard, I think bjacob known some good commands to get them if we really need them - and URLs aren't really interesting. A lot of Facebook, a bit of YouTube.
Flags: needinfo?(kairo)
Updated•13 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 13 years ago
Resolution: --- → INCOMPLETE
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•