Closed
Bug 858854
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Manual settings for socks host/port supersede system proxy setting
Categories
(Core :: Networking, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 849792
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox21 | --- | unaffected |
firefox22 | - | affected |
firefox23 | - | affected |
People
(Reporter: whimboo, Unassigned)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:22.0) Gecko/20130405 Firefox/22.0 ID:20130405004016 CSet: 272dd16b0d95
I have upgraded my Aurora version to the new 22.0a2 today and since the restart Firefox is not able to connect to the network anymore. It claims that a proxy server is refusing the connection. The only setting I have in Firefox is the system proxy, and in the Gnome settings no proxy is selected.
When I use the same Aurora version with another profile which also has the system proxy set, everything works fine. So I have started Aurora in safe mode with my default profile but that doesn't make a difference.
I will dive through the preferences the next days which might give us a clue what could be the reason for that behavior.
The failure I get:
The proxy server is refusing connections
Firefox is configured to use a proxy server that is refusing connections.
Check the proxy settings to make sure that they are correct.
Contact your network administrator to make sure the proxy server is working.
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
can you send me the prefs.js from your profile? (or just grep it for proxy)
I wonder if you have some inconsistent config fragment that is causing a problem (e.g. a socks port number defined even after you have said don't use socks) or something along those lines
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
Good call regarding socks host/port. That was indeed the problem. But those were entered sometime ago when I had the setting enabled for manual proxy settings. I switched back to system proxy a while back, so any manual setting shouldn't have an effect for Firefox. But as it seems a check for the socks host doesn't care about that and still uses the inactive setting.
So that's indeed a regression in 22.0a2.
Steps:
1. Create a fresh profile
2. Edit proxy settings and define a socks host/port in manual settings
3. Switch to system proxy settings
4. Try to load a page
Starting with 22.0a2 we fail to load the page now.
Summary: After upgrading Aurora from 21.0a2 to 22.0a2 no pages can be loaded (The proxy server is refusing connections) → Manual settings for socks host/port supersede system proxy setting
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
you don't have to bother with the regression window.. Its probably a side effect of making socks changes dynamically visible and I suspect just exposed this latent bug.. I actually think its a dup of something on file. I'll try and get to it this week
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Don't worry it's a quick check. Here the results:
PASS: 130309 http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e6215e0357fa
FAIL: 130310 http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9e6232e86000
Changelog:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=e6215e0357fa&tochange=9e6232e86000
There is only one proxy related change in there which is bug 824341.
Blocks: 824341
status-firefox21:
--- → unaffected
status-firefox23:
--- → affected
tracking-firefox23:
--- → ?
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Flags: in-testsuite?
Updated•12 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) from comment #5)
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 849792 ***
Are you sure about this? FF18 is affected by bug 817533, but FF21 is marked as unaffected here.
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
I'm sure this is a duplicate of bug 849792.
Bug 849792 describes the same symptoms of the same bug as 817533, which now demonstrates in a new situation.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•