Don't allow sites to interfere with browser UI

VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 86194

Status

VERIFIED DUPLICATE of bug 86194
18 years ago
2 years ago

People

(Reporter: BenB, Unassigned)

Tracking

({meta})

Trunk
Future
Dependency tree / graph

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

(Reporter)

Description

18 years ago
I don't want remote content (websites, mails etc.) to ever interfere with my
ability to interact with the browser, e.g. by the site disabling the main menu
or context menu. This is a tracking bug to remove offending code or make it
strictly optional.
(Reporter)

Updated

18 years ago
Blocks: 86194
Depends on: 86193
Keywords: mozilla1.0
(Reporter)

Updated

18 years ago
No longer depends on: 86193
(Reporter)

Updated

18 years ago
Depends on: 86193
(Reporter)

Updated

18 years ago
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Depends on: 86282, 86284
Keywords: mozilla1.0
Target Milestone: --- → Future
(Reporter)

Comment 1

17 years ago
->nobody
Assignee: ben.bucksch → nobody
Status: ASSIGNED → NEW
QA Contact: chofmann → nobody

Comment 2

17 years ago
Adding meta keyword. Sorry for the spam!
Keywords: meta

Updated

17 years ago
Depends on: 107949

Updated

17 years ago
Depends on: 141863

Updated

17 years ago
Depends on: 101509

Updated

17 years ago
No longer depends on: 86284

Comment 3

16 years ago
This bug is a duplicate of bug 86194 or the other way round. Both bugs are meta
bugs and both are about the same thing: Give users all the power and not the
page. Since this bug seems to not have been used for quite a while, while 86194
is still regularly used as meta bug, I'm suggestion to mark this one as a
duplicate of 86194. Has anyone any reason to vote against doing that?
(Reporter)

Comment 4

16 years ago
tgos, you can see that both bugs were filed by me in sequence and that this bug
blocks the "power for users" bug. I considered this a subset of that bug.

I was meant to organize bugs a bit. Unfortunately, it seems that people didn't
see the distinction and just added all bugs to the "power for users" bug and not
here (and so indirectly to the power for users bugs) as it was intended.

I am reluctant to "fix" the dependencies, because that triggers a lot of spam.
Suggestions, opinions?

Comment 5

16 years ago
> Suggestions, opinions?

I'd say either fix the dependencies or close this bug. As it is now, this bug is
more confusing than good.

Comment 6

16 years ago
s/this bug/the lack of distinction between this bug and bug 86194/

Comment 7

16 years ago
Well, this bug here has only two dependencies open. So I suggest to move them
over and close this one.

pi
(Reporter)

Updated

16 years ago
No longer blocks: 86194
(Reporter)

Comment 8

16 years ago
ok.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 86194 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 16 years ago
No longer depends on: 86193, 101509
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE

Comment 9

16 years ago
verifying DUPLICATE

pi
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
(Assignee)

Updated

2 years ago
Product: Core → Core Graveyard
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.