86438 - RPM: Should libmsgbaseutil.so go into mozilla-mail instead of mozilla?

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(SeaMonkey :: Build Config, defect)

Description

[Aleksey Nogin]

Is there a reason for mail support libraries like libmsgbaseutil.so to go into
mozilla RPM instead of mozilla-mail RPM?

Comment 1

[Christopher Blizzard (:blizzard)]

Good question.  Seth, why is this library in the [browser] section instead of
the [mail] section of the installer packager files?  Is there something that's
used by the browser?

Comment 2

[(not reading, please use [e-mail] instead)]

it should be part of [mail] (it is for packages-win) or not packaged at all.

I'm looking into the "not packaged at all" issue.

Comment 3

[(not reading, please use [e-mail] instead)]

follow up:  it is definitely needed.  I was just being stoopid.

it should be part of [mail].

Comment 4

[Christopher Blizzard (:blizzard)]

Simple patch.  Seth, can you review?

Index: packages-unix
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/mozilla/xpinstall/packager/packages-unix,v
retrieving revision 1.154
diff -u -r1.154 packages-unix
--- packages-unix       2001/05/17 19:16:36     1.154
+++ packages-unix       2001/06/18 20:44:27
@@ -53,7 +53,6 @@
 bin/libgtkxtbin.so
 bin/libmozjpeg.so
 bin/libjsj.so
-bin/libmsgbaseutil.so
 bin/libprotocol.so
 bin/libgkgfx.so
 bin/run-mozilla.sh
@@ -291,6 +290,7 @@
 [mail]
 bin/libldap40.so
 bin/liblber40.so
+bin/libmsgbaseutil.so
 bin/components/addrbook.xpt
 bin/components/libaddrbook.so
 bin/components/liblocalmail.so

Comment 5

[(not reading, please use [e-mail] instead)]

sr=sspitzer

thanks for cleaning this up.

Comment 6

[cls]

r=cls

Comment 7

[Asa Dotzler [:asa]]

a= [e-mail] for checkin to the trunk.
(on behalf of drivers)

Comment 8

[Christopher Blizzard (:blizzard)]

asa also approved this for 0.9.2 as well

Comment 9

[Christopher Blizzard (:blizzard)]

Checked in.