Closed
Bug 872444
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
Add teardown() method in tests that are missing it, in order to clean up
Categories
(Mozilla QA Graveyard :: Mozmill Tests, defect)
Mozilla QA Graveyard
Mozmill Tests
Tracking
(firefox23 wontfix, firefox24 fixed, firefox25 fixed, firefox26 fixed, firefox27 fixed, firefox-esr17 fixed)
People
(Reporter: AndreeaMatei, Assigned: alexdovbysh)
Details
(Whiteboard: [endurance][mentor=andreea.matei][lang=js][good first bug])
Attachments
(3 files, 6 obsolete files)
|
9.12 KB,
patch
|
AndreeaMatei
:
review-
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
8.72 KB,
patch
|
AndreeaMatei
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
|
4.10 KB,
patch
|
andrei
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
I've noticed that test endurance/testPrivateBrowsing_OpenAndClose/test1.js does not have a teardown() method in order to make sure all pb windows are closed. We should add one.
Further than that, I think we should look for other cases, if any.
| Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [enhancement][mentor=andreea.matei][lang=js][good first bug]
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
I would not put this into the enhancement bucket but as a possible candidate for test failures.
Summary: Add teardown() method in order to clean up, if necessary → Add teardown() method to 'endurance/testPrivateBrowsing_OpenAndClose/test1.js' to clean up, if necessary
Whiteboard: [enhancement][mentor=andreea.matei][lang=js][good first bug] → [endurance][mentor=andreea.matei][lang=js][good first bug]
First of all, Andreea Matei thanks for your help at irc.
well, for better understanding of this .js file i would like to take a look at aModule class, but i cant find where is defined. Even so this patch should work.
Attachment #767957 -
Flags: review?
| Reporter | ||
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 767957 [details] [diff] [review]
add_teardownModule_method
Review of attachment 767957 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Olek, there are just 2 thing to edit before we can land this.
Regarding aModule, it's not a class that you can find, is just a parameter in order to have the object instances declared globally.
Could you please add my email to the r? textbox when you add a patch? That way I'm notified I have to make a review :) Thanks!
::: tests/endurance/testPrivateBrowsing_OpenAndClose/test1.js
@@ +11,5 @@
>
> function setupModule(aModule) {
> aModule.controller = mozmill.getBrowserController();
> aModule.enduranceManager = new Endurance.EnduranceManager(aModule.controller);
> + aModule.pb = new privateBrowsing.PrivateBrowsingWindow();
I would leave this as pbWindow, I feel is clearer and usually we use the class name like "enduranceManager" or "tabBrowser". I think it was misleading for you from the other tests that use pb instead. I'll file a bug for refactoring this (or if you want to do that, would be great).
@@ +25,2 @@
> function testOpenAndClosePrivateBrowsingWindow() {
> + enduranceManager.run(function () {
You have added some trailing whitespaces
Attachment #767957 -
Flags: review? → review-
| Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
One more thing Olek, could you please check for other tests that don't have teardownModule()? I think I saw one in functional/tabbedBrowsing/testCloseTab.js:
http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/file/default/tests/functional/testTabbedBrowsing/testCloseTab.js
Not sure if there are others as well. Thanks!
status-firefox22:
--- → affected
status-firefox23:
--- → affected
status-firefox24:
--- → affected
status-firefox25:
--- → affected
status-firefox-esr17:
--- → affected
Summary: Add teardown() method to 'endurance/testPrivateBrowsing_OpenAndClose/test1.js' to clean up, if necessary → Add teardown() method in tests that are missing it, in order to clean up
trailing whitespaces deleted.
added changes to /functional/testPrivateBrowsing/testPrivateDownlodPanel.js. Replaced 'pb' by 'pbWindow'.
This is a file that misleads me xd.
Attachment #767957 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #768246 -
Flags: review?
I dont see your post. I checked only directory endurance and yes I'll check for others.
I left some files without teardown() method in functional/testSecurity and /functional/restartTests but i don't sure if it's necessary to add it. (I'm doubting what this method would contain in those cases).
Attachment #768246 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #768246 -
Flags: review?
Attachment #768859 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 768859 [details] [diff] [review]
add_teardownModule_method
Review of attachment 768859 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Giving that you modify multiple tests, could you please run at least a functional testrun with your patch applied?
Here's how you can do that, you'll only need to add the --repository=path_to_your_repo:
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozmill_Tests#Running_Mozmill_tests
That's how you can make sure you've not introduced any regressions to the other tests.
::: tests/endurance/testPrivateBrowsing_OpenAndClose/test1.js
@@ +1,1 @@
> +/* This Source C}ode Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
You have introduced a character here.
@@ +13,5 @@
> aModule.controller = mozmill.getBrowserController();
> aModule.enduranceManager = new Endurance.EnduranceManager(aModule.controller);
> + aModule.pbWindow = new privateBrowsing.PrivateBrowsingWindow();
> + aModule.tabBrowser = new Tabs.tabBrowser(aModule.controller);
> + aModule.tabBrowser.closeAllTabs();
We need to separate blocks of declarations from the ones with method calls.
::: tests/functional/testSearch/testSearchSuggestions.js
@@ +30,5 @@
> }
>
> +function teardownModule(aModule) {
> + aModule.searchBar.clear();
> + aModule.searchBar.restoreDefaultEngines();
Great catch with the clearing of the search text, but the second I don't think we need it as we're not installing any other engine in this test.
Attachment #768859 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei) → review-
Here result of the functional testrun. I also run all the tests I've modified
$ ./testrun_functional.py --repository=/home/oleksandr/mozmill-tests/ ~/mozilla-central/
*** Platform: Linux Ubuntu 12.04 64bit
*** Cloning repository to '/tmp/tmpH6BKXZ.mozmill-tests'
requesting all changes
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 3247 changesets with 9486 changes to 775 files (+4 heads)
updating to branch default
407 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
File type .exe not supported.
*** Removing repository '/tmp/tmpH6BKXZ.mozmill-tests'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./testrun_functional.py", line 51, in <module>
main()
File "./testrun_functional.py", line 46, in main
FunctionalTestRun().run()
File "/home/oleksandr/mozmill-automation/libs/testrun.py", line 439, in run
raise self.last_exception
Exception: File type .exe not supported.
Attachment #770693 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 770693 [details] [diff] [review]
add_teardownModule_method_v0.3
Review of attachment 770693 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks Olek!
I did a functional testrun for this:
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/a1b02004612785c13cf7c6bf1eb363b0
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/a1b02004612785c13cf7c6bf1eb30adb
And an endurance one:
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/a1b02004612785c13cf7c6bf1eb26b01
It did not worked for you most likely due to the mozilla-central folder. Please download from here the archive for the latest nightly and extract it. Then you just give the patch to firefox/firefox.
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/nightly/latest-mozilla-central/
For the commit message you can drop the <> for the bug and have r=amatei as before, like this:
Bug 872444 - Added teardownModule() methods and changed pb in pbWindow in testPrivateDownlodPanel.js. r=amatei
Landed as:
http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/93b5df4a0d27 (default)
We will need this on the other branches as well.
Attachment #770693 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei) → review+
| Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Hi Olek! Any chance you could check for the other branches?
For each, you just have to clone a repository, do "hg up -C branch_name" and apply the patch. If it applies cleanly, great! If not, you have to solve the conflicts manually and export the patch like "branch_name.patch" so you keep track of them.
The branch names are: mozilla-aurora, mozilla-beta, mozilla-release and mozilla-esr17.
Thanks!
| Assignee | ||
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
Sure, I will check this.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
conflicts solved for release branch
Attachment #786264 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
conflicts solved for mozilla-esr17.
Nightly and aurora already had a patch, and beta has not conflicts.
Here results of functional testrun for aurora and esr17. And i cant find a firefox beta for linux 64bit xD.
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/bccc2ea9ac1e478fa074c699d8807d48
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/bccc2ea9ac1e478fa074c699d8822099
Attachment #786275 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 15•12 years ago
|
||
Attachment #786264 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #786264 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
Attachment #786309 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
| Assignee | ||
Comment 16•12 years ago
|
||
some changes, endurance runtest for esr-17
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/bccc2ea9ac1e478fa074c699d892a74b
Attachment #786275 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #786275 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
Attachment #786311 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
| Reporter | ||
Comment 17•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 786309 [details] [diff] [review]
mozilla-release.patch
Review of attachment 786309 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Olek. We need some small changes to both patches, so it will remain in harmony with the landed patch.
I can see that you didn't fixed the conflicts but just write the changes again, probably that's why you missed them. :)
In general is regarding our 'a' prefix to parameters, we have a working bug now about it (bug 883120) and I wouldn't want to add more work there. And then we use it before calling a method, in setup and teardown, as we did with your first patch.
Thanks!
::: tests/endurance/testFlash_SWFVideoEmbed/test1.js
@@ +31,5 @@
> }
> }
>
> +function teardownModule(aModule) {
> + tabBrowser.closeAllTabs();
Please add aModule here, like you did in the checked in patch:
aModule.tabBrowser.closeAllTabs();
::: tests/endurance/testFlash_SWFVideoObject/test1.js
@@ +32,5 @@
> }
>
> +function teardownModule(aModule) {
> + tabBrowser.closeAllTabs();
> +}
Same here.
::: tests/endurance/testPrivateBrowsing_OpenAndClose/test1.js
@@ +17,5 @@
> }
>
> +function teardownModule(aModule) {
> + pbWindow.close(true);
> + tabBrowser.closeAllTabs();
aModule here as well.
@@ +24,3 @@
> function testOpenAndClosePrivateBrowsingWindow() {
> enduranceManager.run(function () {
> var pbWindow = new privateBrowsing.PrivateBrowsingWindow();
We can remove this now that's declared in setup.
::: tests/functional/testPreferences/testRemoveAllCookies.js
@@ +19,5 @@
>
> Services.cookies.removeAll();
> }
>
> +var teardownModule = function(module) {
Please change the parameter name to aModule. We use 'a' prefix for all parameter, there's a bug that is changing it where we missed it and this would introduce new regressions there.
::: tests/functional/testSearch/testSearchSuggestions.js
@@ +28,5 @@
> }
>
> +function teardownModule() {
> + searchBar.clear();
> +}
Please add aModule as parameter and before the searchBar.
::: tests/functional/testTabbedBrowsing/testCloseTab.js
@@ +14,5 @@
> }
>
> +var teardownModule = function(module) {
> + tabBrowser.closeAllTabs();
> +}
Same here, aModule.
Attachment #786309 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei) → review-
| Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Attachment #786311 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei) → review-
| Reporter | ||
Comment 18•12 years ago
|
||
Transplanted the r+ patch to beta as well:
http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/d7c5c1253274 (beta)
status-firefox26:
--- → fixed
Comment 19•12 years ago
|
||
Do you have an updated patch with r+ for ESR17 branch? If you want to land there you'll need to nominate for mozilla-esr
Flags: needinfo?(alexdovbysh)
Comment 20•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to lsblakk@mozilla.com [:lsblakk] from comment #19)
> Do you have an updated patch with r+ for ESR17 branch? If you want to land
> there you'll need to nominate for mozilla-esr
Lukas, this is the mozmill-tests component and we handle all patch landings differently than you for Firefox. There is no nomination needed.
Updated•12 years ago
|
status-firefox22:
affected → ---
Updated•12 years ago
|
Comment 21•12 years ago
|
||
Daniel, this bug is not about Firefox but Mozmill Tests. So please do not change our flags on behalf of your security work. Thanks.
Comment 22•12 years ago
|
||
Andreea, seems like we don't get a reply from Oleksandr. Can someone finish this bug off?
Flags: needinfo?(alexdovbysh)
Updated•12 years ago
|
| Reporter | ||
Comment 23•12 years ago
|
||
Sure. Mario will finish here.
Comment 24•12 years ago
|
||
The patch got merged along with Beta on Release and only esr17 needed a backport. I haven't updated the teardownModule with (aModule) as we have a refactor bug that will do that - Bug 883120.
Linux report:
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/ec449c026814fd64783d738c0268872d
Attachment #786309 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #786311 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #816581 -
Flags: review?(andrei.eftimie)
Attachment #816581 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
Comment 25•12 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 816581 [details] [diff] [review]
ESR17_v2
Review of attachment 816581 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
This looks good to me.
Since the modified tests are in different folders, please run a functional, a remote and an endurance testrun on ESR17.
I'll land this once we have these reports.
Attachment #816581 -
Flags: review?(andrei.eftimie)
Attachment #816581 -
Flags: review?(andreea.matei)
Attachment #816581 -
Flags: review+
Comment 26•12 years ago
|
||
Reports for ESR17:
Functional:
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/ec449c026814fd64783d738c02983391
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/functional/report/ec449c026814fd64783d738c029930c2
Remote:
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/remote/report/ec449c026814fd64783d738c02999394
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/remote/report/ec449c026814fd64783d738c029a357b
Endurance:
http://mozmill-crowd.blargon7.com/#/endurance/report/ec449c026814fd64783d738c02967c61
Comment 27•12 years ago
|
||
Landed:
http://hg.mozilla.org/qa/mozmill-tests/rev/c36cb52c42d4 (mozilla-esr17)
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
status-firefox27:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•6 years ago
|
Product: Mozilla QA → Mozilla QA Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•