888604 - would be nice to have nsIURI thread-safe

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

Comment 1

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

nsIURI can be JS-implemented via JS components...

Comment 2

[Andrea Marchesini [:baku]]

so the answer is no. Let's mark this bug as invalid.

Comment 3

[Masatoshi Kimura [:emk]]

Will the URL API parse any random user-defined schemes? For example, "relative scheme" is defined as a fixed white list in the spec.
http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-url-scheme

Comment 4

[Andrea Marchesini [:baku]]

(In reply to Masatoshi Kimura [:emk] from comment #3)
> Will the URL API parse any random user-defined schemes? For example,
> "relative scheme" is defined as a fixed white list in the spec.
> http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-url-scheme

I added a test in Bug 887364 and yes, it parsers any random user-defined relative scheme.

Comment 5

[Masatoshi Kimura [:emk]]

(In reply to Andrea Marchesini (:baku) from comment #4)
> (In reply to Masatoshi Kimura [:emk] from comment #3)
> > Will the URL API parse any random user-defined schemes? For example,
> > "relative scheme" is defined as a fixed white list in the spec.
> > http://url.spec.whatwg.org/#concept-url-scheme
> 
> I added a test in Bug 887364 and yes, it parsers any random user-defined
> relative scheme.

My question was "is it compliant to the spec?".
I restricted acceptable encoding labels when I implemented the Encoding Standard.