896537 - FF svg prints wrong but display is correct (includes test case)

Status: NEW

(Core :: Printing: Output, defect)

Description

[Annon0m0s]

Attachment: Test case ff_svg_print_bug.svg

User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/22.0 (Beta/Release)
Build ID: 20130618035212

Steps to reproduce:

1) Open svg file (2) print (3) compare what was printed to screen.  Svg test file is attached.


Actual results:

FF version 22.0 correctly shows the svg on the monitor. Print preview is clicked and shows the correct print preview. But the actual printed page does not match the svg. Many of the black boxes are completely black and are missing significant obvious white lines. Scan of printed file is attached.


Expected results:

The printed output should match the svg on the monitor. Perhaps the problem is the FF printing code is not processing the svg Mask correctly.

Comment 1

[Annon0m0s]

Attachment: scanned printed output ff_print_bug.png

Attached is the scanned output from the printer showing the incorrectly printed svg.

Comment 2

[Daniel Holbert [:dholbert]]

Prints correctly on Linux, in Firefox Nightly:
 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.0) Gecko/20130721 Firefox/25.0
and Firefox release (from Ubuntu):
 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Ubuntu; Linux x86_64; rv:22.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/22.0

This is probably a windows-graphics-internals specific thing. Possibly related to bug 894917, another windows-only svg-shapes-not-printing bug.

Comment 3

[Alice0775 White]

Regression window(m-c)
Good:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/dad825159748
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110527 Firefox/7.0a1 ID:20110527011902
Bad:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/04e8d0b481bc
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:7.0a1) Gecko/20110527 Firefox/7.0a1 ID:20110527081111
Pushlog:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/pushloghtml?fromchange=dad825159748&tochange=04e8d0b481bc


Regressed by: Bug 562746 - Update cairo to 1.10


There are too many regression due to Bug 562746 .

Please backed out Bug 562746!!!

Comment 4

[Alex Keybl [:akeybl]]

This isn't a recent regression, so it'd require an external force for us to track (major new impacted web property).