Closed Bug 901041 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Remove 'swipe left' screen in tutorial (as part of the first run experience)

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::First Time Experience, defect)

x86
macOS
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(blocking-b2g:leo+, b2g18 verified, b2g-v1.1hd fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
blocking-b2g leo+
Tracking Status
b2g18 --- verified
b2g-v1.1hd --- fixed

People

(Reporter: clee, Assigned: fcampo)

References

Details

Attachments

(1 file)

With the change in moving the app search bar to the Home Screen landing page, the team has agreed to remove the 'swipe left to discover new apps' in the Tutorial which is at the end of the First-Run experience. Will attach the screenshot shortly.
Marking leo+ and will request all partners to pick this up for v1.1.
blocking-b2g: --- → leo+
Assignee: nobody → fernando.campo
As this modification implies changes in l10n strings, maybe we would rather other options. What would be the best option for all, when we are this late in the game? 1. step2 disappears, step3 becomes step2, 4 becomes 3, 5 becomes 4. That would mean that we change the strings to something like tutorial-step1, tutorial-step2-2, tutorial-step3-2, tutorial-step4-2 2. we simply skip step2, jumping from 1 to 3, we don't make changes in the strings (apart from deleting the useless one), but there's an obvious jump in the steps (not noticeable for the user, but would make code look weird)
(In reply to Fernando Campo (:fcampo) from comment #3) > As this modification implies changes in l10n strings, maybe we would rather > other options. What would be the best option for all, when we are this late > in the game? > > 1. step2 disappears, step3 becomes step2, 4 becomes 3, 5 becomes 4. That > would mean that we change the strings to something like > tutorial-step1, > tutorial-step2-2, > tutorial-step3-2, > tutorial-step4-2 > tutorial-step4-3 right? I think I would buy option 1. I'm way more scared of having an exception in the logic that removing one step.
patch v1, eliminates the 2nd step of tutorial
Attachment #785732 - Flags: review?(l10n)
Attachment #785732 - Flags: review?(francisco.jordano)
Attachment #785732 - Flags: feedback?(clee)
Keywords: late-l10n
Comment on attachment 785732 [details] [review] Link to PR - https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/11344 We should not re-ID strings for this, in particular not for v1-train, i.e., for for option 2. Note, if the names had originally been semantic, we'd not have this problem. Like "hold-delete" instead of "3". That'd be candy for a follow-up, and out of scope for v1-train.
Attachment #785732 - Flags: review?(l10n) → review-
Attachment #785732 - Flags: review?(francisco.jordano) → review+
Fernando do you really need to change any strings or can't you simply change the key attribute in the js file to point to the corresponding key. This can be changed later if you want a more semantic stuff...
(In reply to Vivien Nicolas (:vingtetun) (:21) from comment #7) > Fernando do you really need to change any strings or can't you simply change > the key attribute in the js file to point to the corresponding key. This can > be changed later if you want a more semantic stuff... Ping?
(In reply to Vivien Nicolas (:vingtetun) (:21) from comment #8) > (In reply to Vivien Nicolas (:vingtetun) (:21) from comment #7) > > Fernando do you really need to change any strings or can't you simply change > > the key attribute in the js file to point to the corresponding key. This can > > be changed later if you want a more semantic stuff... > > Ping? Sorry, I got caught up in other things and slipped my mind. And as an answer...no, we don't need to change the strings. I can just make the step to point at a different string without modifying any. I guess that with a comment on the code to not forget about it on future releases (when we are not string-frozen) Updating the PR and asking for review again
Comment on attachment 785732 [details] [review] Link to PR - https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/11344 Taking out Pike from review as this have no more changes to l10n (welcomed for feedback) Asking for review again as the patch has changed, putting vivien as he has following the thread (redirect if you think francisco is better)
Attachment #785732 - Flags: review?(21)
Attachment #785732 - Flags: review-
Attachment #785732 - Flags: review+
Opened bug 902487 as a followup for changes on strings
Keywords: late-l10n
Comment on attachment 785732 [details] [review] Link to PR - https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/pull/11344 Thanks for the quick update. And I agree that the situation is not ideal for such type of changes! It can be fixed in a followup for 1.2 though.
Attachment #785732 - Flags: review?(21) → review+
Chris, Based on comment 1 you wanted this in 1.1. Comment 12 is suggesting fixing it in 1.2. Please confirm if clearly if this will be an issue for product team.
Flags: needinfo?(clee)
Stealing that needinfo: We want the current patch in 1.1. There's opportunity to refactor the code to not hard code which tutorial step is the 5th, making the maintenance of the code easier. That's for 1.2 or later.
Flags: needinfo?(clee)
v1.1.0hd: 8745c102acf9fa51f05b3d582af1132ca7f58cd9
On latest build, confirmed swipe left in tutorial has been removed from First Run Experience. Environmental Variables Build ID: 20130813041202 Gecko: http://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g18/rev/36bbc5943448 Gaia: df57dcec720493bedff4601499d78c147ad7d253 Platform Version: 18.1 RIL Version: 01.01.00.019.190 Firmware Version: D300f08o
Attachment #785732 - Flags: feedback?(clee)
Attachment mime type: text/plain → text/x-github-pull-request
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: