Closed
Bug 913885
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 11 years ago
Differential Testing: Different output message involving schedulegc
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla26
People
(Reporter: gkw, Assigned: jorendorff)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, testcase)
Attachments
(1 file)
2.66 KB,
patch
|
Waldo
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
try {
Object.defineProperty(this, "a1", {
get: function() {
return [({}), eval("eval(\"\",\"\")", x), ({})]
}
})
a1;
var x, u;
} catch (e) {}
try {
schedulegc(5);
a1
} catch (e) {}
prints the following on js opt shell on m-c changeset 3697f962bb7b without any CLI arguments, when the testcase is passed in as a CLI argument:
1613-interesting.js:4:12 warning: Support for eval(code, scopeObject) has been removed. Use |with (scopeObject) eval(code);| instead.
1613-interesting.js:4:0 warning: Support for eval(code, scopeObject) has been removed. Use |with (scopeObject) eval(code);| instead.
However it prints the following with --ion-eager:
1613-interesting.js:4:12 warning: Support for eval(code, scopeObject) has been removed. Use |with (scopeObject) eval(code);| instead.
1613-interesting.js:4:0 warning: Support for eval(code, scopeObject) has been removed. Use |with (scopeObject) eval(code);| instead.
1613-interesting.js:4:0 warning: Support for eval(code, scopeObject) has been removed. Use |with (scopeObject) eval(code);| instead.
My configure flags are:
CC="clang -Qunused-arguments" AR=ar CXX="clang++ -Qunused-arguments" sh ./configure --target=x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.0 --enable-optimize --disable-debug --enable-profiling --enable-gczeal --enable-debug-symbols --enable-methodjit --enable-type-inference --disable-tests --enable-more-deterministic --with-ccache --enable-threadsafe <more NSPR compilation flags>
Flags: needinfo?(jdemooij)
![]() |
Reporter | |
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
autoBisect shows this is probably related to the following changeset:
The first bad revision is:
changeset: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/77e2eaaf2fbb
user: Jason Orendorff
date: Fri Sep 06 12:05:30 2013 -0500
summary: Bug 893186, part 5 - Delete JS_GetPropertyAttributes and many similar APIs; remove half a dozen methods from JS::Class. r=Waldo.
Jason, is bug 893186 a possible regressor?
Blocks: 893186
Flags: needinfo?(jdemooij) → needinfo?(jorendorff)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•11 years ago
|
||
It's possible, but the bug doesn't reproduce for me in tip. Building 77e2eaaf2fbb now...
Flags: needinfo?(jorendorff)
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
I can't reproduce it in 77e2eaaf2fbb either.
Whether or not we generate the third warning depends on whether we get an eval cache hit. So I think it's nondeterministic, and it would be good to skip this warning when fuzzing.
However I think it's better to delete this warning entirely now. Waldo, do you agree?
Flags: needinfo?(jwalden+bmo)
![]() |
Reporter | |
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jason Orendorff [:jorendorff] from comment #3)
> I can't reproduce it in 77e2eaaf2fbb either.
I tested on Mac 10.8, and my configure options are as in comment 0. How about rev 3697f962bb7b as specified there?
It may have gone away though..
Comment 5•11 years ago
|
||
I think at this point we can just kill the warning. We haven't shipped two-argument eval in years, now.
Flags: needinfo?(jwalden+bmo)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•11 years ago
|
||
OK then.
Assignee: general → jorendorff
Attachment #803788 -
Flags: review?(jwalden+bmo)
Comment on attachment 803788 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
Review of attachment 803788 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: js/src/builtin/Eval.cpp
@@ -407,5 @@
> -WarnOnTooManyArgs(JSContext *cx, const CallArgs &args)
> -{
> - if (args.length() > 1) {
> - Rooted<JSScript*> script(cx, cx->currentScript());
> - if (script && !script->warnedAboutTwoArgumentEval) {
You forgot about warnedAboutTwoArgumentEval in JSScript
Comment 8•11 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 803788 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
Review of attachment 803788 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, remove the deadweight JSScript field, too.
Attachment #803788 -
Flags: review?(jwalden+bmo) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 10•11 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite?
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla26
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•