913992 - [Tracking bug] automation support for B2G v1.2.0

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Release Engineering :: General, defect)

Description

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

We'll be needing automation support for b2g v1.2 soon, so that v1.3 work can land on master. Let's get the branches, repos, etc. created ahead of time. Note: to start with, v1.2 should be kept closed to developer-checkins until we get the official word.

For reference, bug#850481 tracked setup for v1.1.0, and bug#877787 tracked setup for v1.1.0hd.

Comment 1

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

So, I think all we need to do here is make sure that b2g builds/tests get activated on aurora as part of the merging process next week.

Comment 2

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Also required:
- 1.2 branches in gaia, b2g-manifests
- update config.json in mozilla-aurora after the merge to point to new 1.2 branches
- bump version number for m-c/master builds

Comment 3

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

We also need to make sure the new v1.2 branch, and any l10n repos, are replicated/mirrored over to git.m.o, like we've done for earlier B2G releases.

Comment 4

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

For the next cycle, 1.2 development will be happening on mozilla-aurora and 1.3 work will begin on mozilla-central. We need to make sure all B2G builds and tests currently active on mozilla-central are enabled on aurora next week.

Comment 5

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Attachment: bump b2g versions

For merge day - bump mozilla-central to 1.3.0 and add mozilla-aurora as 1.2.0

Comment 6

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Comment on attachment 803546 [details] [diff] [review]
bump b2g versions

I don't think we're converting aurora in gecko.git atm; I think we'll have to make that change for 1.2.0 to work.

Comment 7

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Attachment: add b2g builds/tests for mozilla-aurora

this should land as part of mergeday fun

Comment 8

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Attachment: add b2g builds/tests for mozilla-aurora

fixed a typo

Comment 9

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Attachment: bumps for B2G 1.2 on mozilla-aurora

this needs to land on mozilla-aurora after the merge happens

Comment 10

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Attachment: clean up m-c b2g configs

we should land this before the merge, we don't build for these targets any more

Comment 11

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Comment on attachment 803603 [details] [diff] [review]
clean up m-c b2g configs

DIAF!

Comment 12

[Chris AtLee [:catlee]]

Comment on attachment 803603 [details] [diff] [review]
clean up m-c b2g configs

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/da534ba9582e

Comment 13

[hwine]

Comment on attachment 803601 [details] [diff] [review]
add b2g builds/tests for mozilla-aurora

Review of attachment 803601 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

tweak on location of l10n repos in hg

::: mozilla/b2g_config.py
@@ +946,5 @@
> +######## mozilla-aurora
> +# This is a path, relative to HGURL, where the repository is located
> +# HGURL + repo_path should be a valid repository
> +BRANCHES['mozilla-aurora']['repo_path'] = 'releases/mozilla-aurora'
> +BRANCHES['mozilla-aurora']['gaia_l10n_root'] = 'https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/gaia-l10n/v1_2'

repos will actually be under https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/gaia-l10n/v1_2_0/

Comment 14

[hwine]

Comment on attachment 803602 [details] [diff] [review]
bumps for B2G 1.2 on mozilla-aurora

Review of attachment 803602 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

All files need tweak as in emulator-jb/

::: b2g/config/emulator-jb/config.json
@@ +17,4 @@
>      "gaia": {
>          "l10n": {
>              "vcs": "hgtool",
> +            "root": "https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/gaia-l10n/v1_2"

locales will be under "https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/gaia-l10n/v1_2_0/"

Comment 15

[Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM]]

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/da534ba9582e

Comment 16

[Axel Hecht [:Pike]]

(In reply to Hal Wine [:hwine] (use needinfo) from comment #14)
> Comment on attachment 803602 [details] [diff] [review]
> bumps for B2G 1.2 on mozilla-aurora
> 
> Review of attachment 803602 [details] [diff] [review]:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> All files need tweak as in emulator-jb/
> 
> ::: b2g/config/emulator-jb/config.json
> @@ +17,4 @@
> >      "gaia": {
> >          "l10n": {
> >              "vcs": "hgtool",
> > +            "root": "https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/gaia-l10n/v1_2"
> 
> locales will be under "https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/gaia-l10n/v1_2_0/"

Clarification here, too, they actually ended up being under https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/gaia-l10n/v1_2/

Comment 17

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Comment on attachment 803546 [details] [diff] [review]
bump b2g versions

https://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/rev/50c22f55918c

Comment 18

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Comment on attachment 803601 [details] [diff] [review]
add b2g builds/tests for mozilla-aurora

https://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/rev/cface8156a58

Comment 19

[Alex Keybl [:akeybl]]

Still at least partially blocked on the uplift of Gecko 26 & B2G 1.2 from m-c->m-a (see bug 916757)

Comment 20

[Preeti Raghunath(:Preeti)]

Awaiting fixes for 916220,915869. 

John, I've added your team to an email thread. please comment on how much time we have left for fixes to land.

Comment 21

[John O'Duinn [:joduinn] (please use "needinfo?" flag)]

(In reply to Preeti Raghunath(:Preeti) from comment #20)
> Awaiting fixes for 916220,915869. 
> 
> John, I've added your team to an email thread. please comment on how much
> time we have left for fixes to land.

Rail already responded on thread - EOD, at this rate, and assuming no more surprise delays from FF25.0b1.

Comment 22

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Comment on attachment 803602 [details] [diff] [review]
bumps for B2G 1.2 on mozilla-aurora

This is a configuration bump.

Comment 23

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Comment on attachment 803602 [details] [diff] [review]
bumps for B2G 1.2 on mozilla-aurora

https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/6f0f535a5eae

Comment 24

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

The b2g builds look green:
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Aurora&rev=6f0f535a5eae

Comment 25

[Michael Vines [:m1] [:evilmachines]]

(looks like gonk-misc is still missing a v1.2 branch -- http://git.mozilla.org/?p=b2g/gonk-misc.git;a=summary)

Comment 26

[Ed Morley [:emorley]]

Aurora desktop B2G localizer builds broken, see bug 917692.

Comment 27

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

(In reply to Michael Vines [:m1] [:evilmachines] from comment #25)
> (looks like gonk-misc is still missing a v1.2 branch --
> http://git.mozilla.org/?p=b2g/gonk-misc.git;a=summary)

We decided to branch other repos after some feedback from devs.

Comment 28

[Michael Vines [:m1] [:evilmachines]]

(In reply to Rail Aliiev [:rail] from comment #27)
> We decided to branch other repos after some feedback from devs.

v1.2 branches are missing for the following projects.  Is this still in the works?

* librecovery
* gonk-misc
* moztt

Comment 29

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

(In reply to Michael Vines [:m1] [:evilmachines] from comment #28)
> (In reply to Rail Aliiev [:rail] from comment #27)
> > We decided to branch other repos after some feedback from devs.
> 
> v1.2 branches are missing for the following projects.  Is this still in the
> works?
> 
> * librecovery
> * gonk-misc
> * moztt

No decision made regarding branching other repos yet.

Comment 30

[Michael Vines [:m1] [:evilmachines]]

I see, where is this discussion occurring at?  I'd like to participate.  gonk-misc in particular *should* be branched for v1.2. Probably the rest too.

Comment 31

[Rail Aliiev [:rail]]

Th discussion is here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.b2g/JizNVAPFR7A

Comment 32

[Michael Vines [:m1] [:evilmachines]]

Thanks.  It looks like that discussion has fizzled out unfortunately, so has it been moved to a different bug?  If not, what's the plan to branch the projects I list in comment 28 for v1.2?

Comment 33

[Alex Keybl [:akeybl]]

The email thread I had open separately with engineering died down, just brought it back to life. I just want to make sure it's not too early to branch those repos.

Comment 34

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Reopening for branch discussion.

Comment 35

[Michael Vines [:m1] [:evilmachines]]

librecovery/moztt are pretty low traffic, gonk-misc a little higher.  I guess I'm worried that by not branching at the same time as all the other Moz-owned projects for v1.2, we make (1) things more confusing for devs, and as a result (2) a higher risk of landing non-koi+ in v1.2, and finally this (3) makes me have to watch out for #2 and wonder when the v1.2 branch for these projects will finally occur and when it does ensure we update our manifests.

Comment 36

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

I think bug 917173 doesn't strictly block, and we're all done here.
Does anyone think otherwise?

Comment 37

[Aki Sasaki (not active)]

Sounds like it.
Let me know if there are any outstanding issues to resolve, other than bug 917173 which doesn't strictly block.