[B2G][Helix][SIM][wangchao]No limit for the times of enter sim puk when no puk time left.

RESOLVED WONTFIX

Status

Firefox OS
Gaia::System
P2
blocker
RESOLVED WONTFIX
4 years ago
4 years ago

People

(Reporter: lecky, Unassigned)

Tracking

Firefox Tracking Flags

(Not tracked)

Details

Attachments

(1 attachment)

279.30 KB, text/plain
Details
(Reporter)

Description

4 years ago
Created attachment 811641 [details]
adb log.txt

User Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729; .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; .NET4.0C; .NET4.0E; Tablet PC 2.0)

Steps to reproduce:

Repro step
1. install a sim with no puk left retry time(in puk state) and power on.

Excepted:
1. The sim can not be used because left retry time has been 0.

Actual:
1. Can enter puk code with no limit times.

 I think this may because of the sim state limit. And just designed like this.
Is this a feature or bug? Can you check this?

Thanks!
(Reporter)

Updated

4 years ago
Severity: normal → blocker
Flags: needinfo?(wchang)
Priority: -- → P2
Hi Shawn,

Can you check this? If you need to discuss gaia part, Arthur had worked on this area.
Flags: needinfo?(wchang) → needinfo?(sku)

Comment 2

4 years ago
The current ril (<= v1.2) does not handle perm_blocked status yet.

09-16 03:49:37.329 D/RIL_QC_B2G(  158): [0011]< GET_SIM_STATUS {CardState=CARDSTATE_PRESENT,PinState=PINSTATE_UNKNOWN,GsmUmtsSub=0,CdmaSub=-1,mImsSub=-1,num_apps=1,{app_type=APPTYPE_SIM,app_state=APPSTATE_PUK,substate=PERSOSUBSTATE_UNKNOWN,aid=,app_label=,pin1_replaced=0,pin1=PINSTATE_ENABLED_PERM_BLOCKED,pin1_num_retries=0,puk1_num_retries=0,pin2=PINSTATE_ENABLED_NOT_VERIFIED,pin2_num_retries=0,puk2_num_retries=0}}
Flags: needinfo?(sku)
bumping this to 1.3? for consideration.

We do not support this on v1.1.
blocking-b2g: --- → 1.3?

Comment 4

4 years ago
Hi Beatriz:

   As Wayne said: "bumping this to 1.3? for consideration. We do not support this on v1.1.".

   Would you accepted this?

Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(brg)
(In reply to wangchao from comment #4)
> Hi Beatriz:
> 
>    As Wayne said: "bumping this to 1.3? for consideration. We do not support
> this on v1.1.".
> 
>    Would you accepted this?
> 
> Thanks!
Not a blocker for TEF. As a general rule, non-critical bugs for 1.1HD that can
be also reproduced in 1.1 are not blockers for us. This can be solved by the
partner on their own branch.
Flags: needinfo?(brg)
(Reporter)

Updated

4 years ago
Status: UNCONFIRMED → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX

Updated

4 years ago
blocking-b2g: 1.3? → ---
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.