PDF file making Firefox unresponsive
Categories
(Firefox :: PDF Viewer, defect, P3)
Tracking
()
Performance Impact | none |
People
(Reporter: mity, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
(Whiteboard: [pdfjs-performance])
Attachments
(2 files)
Reporter | ||
Updated•12 years ago
|
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
![]() |
||
Comment 3•11 years ago
|
||
![]() |
||
Comment 4•11 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•4 years ago
|
||
I am trying to see if a slow almost hung rendering issue has something in common with this bugzilla.
The problem reported here seems to have been more or less solved by now.
I am using a Windows 10 Pro PC with 32GB of memory. (AMD Ryzen 7 1700 Eight-Core Processor 3.00 GHz).
When I load the link in the original post and select the magnification to 200%, the memory usage did increase as in the attached graph (it is from the performance monitor function of task manager).
However, it is about 1.2GB and as I have already used 8GB for various applications (Firefox, VLC, adobe postscript, etc.) it was not a big deal and I did not particularly notice any sluggishness. FF's UI responded adequately. (My own problem is when UI does not respond at all. That is bad.)
Updated•4 years ago
|
confirming with Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:97.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/97.0
But The speed is fine, and FF does not freeze.
The rendering of the automatic scaled view is ok, but zooming into 200% just brings the result as in comment7. It is impossible to read. Chrome works fine.
Seems not to re-render the pdf when zooming, just zooming the DOM.
Updated•3 years ago
|
Updated•3 years ago
|
Comment 9•2 years ago
|
||
Zooming to a high zoom level (200% is high for this particular PDF) will fall back to CSS zoom.
I'm not sure there's much we can do here, wdyt Calixte?
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 10•2 years ago
|
||
The problem here is the text layer itself which contains a ton of elements.
All the Firefox UI is sluggish because of that (I reported a similar bug few days ago, see bug 1813325).
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 11•1 year ago
|
||
Fx seems to be responsive although the rendering quality in comment 8 is somewhat poor
Description
•