Closed
Bug 932050
Opened 12 years ago
Closed 12 years ago
[B2G][Buri][Dialer] - Making call using "*31#" while CLIR is configured still displays phone number on recieving device
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: RIL, defect)
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:koi+)
People
(Reporter: tnguyen, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: burirun3 ,FT:RIL)
Attachments
(1 file)
32.14 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
When user attempts to use the CLIR code "*31#" before dialing a number, the recieving device will still see the phone number of the device making the call.
Repro Steps:
1) Updated Buri v 1.2 COM RIL to BuildID: 20131025004000
2) Launch the Dialer app
3) Enter the CLIR code "*31" and then an activated phone number
4) Tap the Call button and observe phone that is recieving call
Actual:
Phone number of device with CLIR code "*31#" is not hidden
Expected:
Phone number of device with CLIR code "*31#" is hidden
Environmental Variables:
Device: Buri v1.2 COM RIL
BuildID: 20131025004000
Gaia: 606517ceafe0950c2b89822d5f13353743334f2c
Gecko: 5eabd267ef04
Version: 26.0a2
Firmware Version: US_20131015
RIL Information: 01.02.00.019.082
Notes:
Repro frequency: 100%
See attached: logcat
Updated•12 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: --- → koi?
Comment 1•12 years ago
|
||
Actually, can someone confirm if this reproduces on 1.1 or not? Or find out a build in general when this used to work?
blocking-b2g: koi? → ---
Keywords: regressionwindow-wanted → qawanted
Comment 2•12 years ago
|
||
This was not a feature for 1.1. There were a couple of the new test cases that needed to be updated, and this one looks like it may need to be updated too.
Setting a needinfo for myself to double check.
Flags: needinfo?(ahubenya)
Keywords: qawanted,
regression
Comment 3•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Angela Hubenya from comment #2)
> This was not a feature for 1.1. There were a couple of the new test cases
> that needed to be updated, and this one looks like it may need to be updated
> too.
> Setting a needinfo for myself to double check.
Can you include the actual test case that was used to file this bug?
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•12 years ago
|
||
Here's the test case that was used to file this bug: https://moztrap.mozilla.org/manage/case/9915
Comment 5•12 years ago
|
||
Al - How important of a use case is this? I can't tell how important this bug is to figure out how bad of a bug this is.
Flags: needinfo?(atsai)
![]() |
||
Comment 6•12 years ago
|
||
We should support the function in v1.2. Without the feature, we cannot hide the outgoing call number. We should mark it as koi+.
Mark it as koi? for triage.
blocking-b2g: --- → koi?
Flags: needinfo?(atsai)
Comment 7•12 years ago
|
||
Clearing my needinfo flag since the test case and bug are valid.
Flags: needinfo?(ahubenya)
Comment 8•12 years ago
|
||
Taipei triage result: koi+.
It looks like something we need to fix in commercial RIL.
blocking-b2g: koi? → koi+
Component: Gaia::Dialer → RIL
Whiteboard: burirun3 → burirun3 ,FT:RIL
Comment 10•12 years ago
|
||
This bug should be invalid.
*31# means show number, #31# means hide number
// 3GPP 22.030 Annex B (normative):
In temporary mode, to suppress CLIR for a single call, enter:
' * 31 # <called number> SEND '
In temporary mode, to invoke CLIR for a single call enter:
' # 31 # <called number> SEND '
10-28 14:12:35.590: I/Gecko(140): -*- QCContentHelper_QC_B2G: _parseMMI dialstring: *31#6509336976
10-28 14:12:35.600: D/PHONE_QC_B2G(140): dialing w/ mmi MmiCode { action=* serviceCode=31 poundString=*31# dialingNumber=6509336976}
Comment 11•12 years ago
|
||
Tony, can you please check if your description is right?
Flags: needinfo?(tnguyen)
Comment 12•12 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ken Chang from comment #11)
> Tony, can you please check if your description is right?
Tony - Can you also confirm that the behavior in comment 10 works on device on a 1.2 build?
Reporter | ||
Comment 13•12 years ago
|
||
Hi all,
The behaviors from comment 10 is what I'm experiencing on Buri 1.2 BuildID 20131106004004. The description of the bug was written up in accordance to test case 9915 - which appears to have the incorrect expected result of: "The phone number is not displayed in the device who received the call."
BuildID: 20131106004004
Gaia: 2140c987fdde1c99097018f7e93b0bbd43d2125d
Gecko: 6a831fcb96f4
Version: 26.0
Flags: needinfo?(tnguyen)
Comment 14•12 years ago
|
||
Sounds like this is invalid then. We should update the test case to follow comment 10.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 12 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
Updated•12 years ago
|
Target Milestone: --- → 1.2 C4(Nov8)
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•