93742 - Strict the Get Involved page

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(Developer Documentation Graveyard :: General, defect)

Description

[Henri Sivonen (:hsivonen)]

Make http://www.mozilla.org/get-involved.html compliant to HTML 4.01 Strict.

Comment 1

[Henri Sivonen (:hsivonen)]

Attachment: Patch for making the Page Strict

Comment 2

[Henri Sivonen (:hsivonen)]

Gerv, is the patch OK? If it is, could you please check it in? If the patch is
OK, I can produce more similar patches for other pages. :-)

Comment 3

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

Thanks for doing this :-)

As far as I'm concerned, I'm going to check in any patches you like that don't 
change the text of the page. I am assuming you've got the knowledge and have 
done the cross-browser testing; I certainly can't. However, you'll get all 
complaints referred to you as well.

However, this week is bad, as I'm travelling to Mountain View. I might get to 
this, but I can't guarantee it.

Also, I like diff -u :-)

Gerv

Comment 4

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

OK, I'm now in a position to sort this out. Could I have a diff -u, please?

Gerv

Comment 5

[Henri Sivonen (:hsivonen)]

Attachment: Patch with diff -u

Comment 6

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

Ok, so I suck.

Now I've got around to reviewing this... the only problem is that DTs are the
same as DDs in NS 4.x (probably because it doesn't pick up the style.) Anything
we can do about that? Use <strong>?

Gerv

Comment 7

[Henri Sivonen (:hsivonen)]

Oh why can't the zombie browser just go away?

How serious do you think not bolding in Nav4.x is? The text is perfectly
readable anyway. Nav4.x users just get slightly worse presentation. Using a
broken browser is like that. Why should we hide the ugly truth from the users of
the broken browser? Let's think positively and consider this an incentive to
upgrade. :-)
Using <b> would be more correct that using <stong>, because the bolding is
presentational--not structural emphasis.

Comment 8

[Gervase Markham [:gerv]]

Checked in.

Gerv

Comment 9

[Henri Sivonen (:hsivonen)]

Thanks.

Comment 10

[Daniel Wang]

v