Martin, did you apply the patch in bug 68045? FastLoad doesn't work correctly without it, last time I checked. QA-contacting jrgm for confirmation. /be
No I didn't apply the patch, and don't know how. Do you see this problem while uning the patch ?. I think that it would be easier to check for yourself than to begin explaining me hoy to apply the patch... :) BTW, problem still occurs on this morning Win32 build 2001080904
I've seen this happen without enabling the pref. I believe this is another aspect of the general problem noted in bug 93558, which seems to be independent of fastload [although does come "close" in that xul resources are not being loaded from jar files]. (And to confirm, without applying the patch in bug 68045, fastload doesn't work correctly, although if the pref is on, then you will travel its code paths).
Then, as I suspected, this is not my bug. /be *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 93558 ***