Closed
Bug 958041
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
[DSDS] When unlock SIM PIN in FTE, due to device hasn't camped on network yet, the next SIM manager page will show "No operator" under the SIM.
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::First Time Experience, defect)
Firefox OS Graveyard
Gaia::First Time Experience
x86_64
Gonk (Firefox OS)
Tracking
(tracking-b2g:backlog, b2g-v2.2 fixed)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
b2g-v2.2 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: echu, Assigned: mancas, Mentored)
Details
(Whiteboard: dsdsrun1.3-2, [systemsfe][lang=js][good first bug])
Attachments
(2 files)
When unlock SIM PIN in FTE, due to device hasn't camped on network yet, the next SIM manager page will show "No operator" under the SIM. Suggest to change the wording to something like "Searching..." which will not be so frastrated. * Build Number Fugu Gaia 22bc6be5b76cdc6d4e9667ff070979041a20ce2f Gecko cd8bc54e911470fa6519d461e5e6b3ddc8f57f5f BuildID 20140109175226 Version 28.0a2 * Reproduce Steps 1. Insert 2 SIM cards in device and one of it is PIN enabled. 2. Unlock PIN in FTE page. Check next SIM Manager page. * Expected Result The carrier information under the SIM just got unlocked should be other than just "No operator". Maybe "Searching" will be better or others that will not mislead user that SIM card is broken or out of range. * Actual Result "No operator" under the SIM. * Occurrence rate 100%
Hi Carrie, It would be great if you can comment on this bug for a better choice, thank you.
Flags: needinfo?(cawang)
Whiteboard: dsdsrun1.3-2
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Hi Enpei, Yes, we've discussed this before. The wording "No operator" is a little bit negative and which is not exactly correct. I'd suggest to use "searching" to provide the current status for users. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(cawang)
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Still on Fugu v1.4 Gaia 0996eecb1b34e66dba6ab082a9b4f03e6861c0de Gecko b7d7d9a2d4c5c9c2d620d237685700dd560cafce BuildID 20140417041552 Version 30.0a2
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.0?
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: dsdsrun1.3-2 → dsdsrun1.3-2, [systemsfe]
Updated•10 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: 2.0? → backlog
Whiteboard: dsdsrun1.3-2, [systemsfe] → dsdsrun1.3-2, [systemsfe][mentor=mhenretty][lang=javascript][good first bug]
Updated•10 years ago
|
Mentor: mhenretty
Whiteboard: dsdsrun1.3-2, [systemsfe][mentor=mhenretty][lang=javascript][good first bug] → dsdsrun1.3-2, [systemsfe][lang=javascript][good first bug]
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: dsdsrun1.3-2, [systemsfe][lang=javascript][good first bug] → dsdsrun1.3-2, [systemsfe][lang=js][good first bug]
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → b.mcb
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8478906 -
Flags: review?(jmcf)
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8478906 -
Flags: review?(jmcf) → review?(fernando.campo)
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8478906 [details] [review] Text has been changed Code is perfect, but I'd go better for a full change of the string id now that the meaning has totally changed. Also, we might want to keep 'noOperator' for the cases when the SIM card is no longer searching, but just unable to connect (I honestly don't know if this is possible tbh, but I have some SIMs that will never connect to a network for example). Anyways, I'd rather have some feedback from l10n about this change.
Attachment #8478906 -
Flags: review?(fernando.campo) → feedback?(francesco.lodolo)
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8478906 [details] [review] Text has been changed Having a string ID "noOperator2" with no connection to the actual text/usage of the string is kind of confusing. Since we're already changing the string ID, it makes sense to pick a good one (I'd go for searchingOperator or similar).
Attachment #8478906 -
Flags: feedback?(francesco.lodolo) → feedback-
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8478906 [details] [review] Text has been changed Please, take a look at the new commit. Thanks
Attachment #8478906 -
Flags: review?(fernando.campo)
Attachment #8478906 -
Flags: feedback?(francesco.lodolo)
Attachment #8478906 -
Flags: feedback-
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8478906 [details] [review] Text has been changed Thanks, looks definitely better.
Attachment #8478906 -
Flags: feedback?(francesco.lodolo) → feedback+
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8478906 [details] [review] Text has been changed yeah, definitely nicer, thanks!
Attachment #8478906 -
Flags: review?(fernando.campo) → review+
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Master: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/248d88faeaf1398d253d8e32982710fed0b97bd4
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
status-b2g-v2.2:
--- → fixed
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 2.1 S5 (26sep)
Updated•9 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: backlog → ---
tracking-b2g:
--- → backlog
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•