Created attachment 8375830 [details] Screen Shot 2014-02-14 at 00.06.57.png User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 (Beta/Release) Build ID: 20140213004002 Steps to reproduce: I opened Dev Tools -> Network -> Clicked performance analysis start button. Actual results: I saw back button taking a lot of place vertically. Expected results: I am not sure. Just wondering if it shouldn't have been in the bottom left or some other place, so it wouldn't take so much place just saying "Back". This is just my humble opinion from the user point of view.
Thanks, Žilvinas! I can confirm that's what it looks like on 29 and on 30, but like you, I'm not sure what it was intended to look like by the designers or ux team. Passing this along to the Developer Tools folks for them to have a look.
Component: Untriaged → Developer Tools: Netmonitor
How about a small left arrow?
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Mac OS X → Unspecified
Hardware: x86 → Unspecified
Version: 29 Branch → unspecified
Summary: Performance analysis "Back" button → Performance analysis "Back" button takes too much vertical space
Per policy at https://wiki.mozilla.org/Bug_Triage/Projects/Bug_Handling/Bug_Husbandry#Inactive_Bugs. If this bug is not an enhancement request or a bug not present in a supported release of Firefox, then it may be reopened.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 8 months ago
Resolution: --- → INACTIVE
If there was a back button, it's not there anymore. Shoulnd't this bug be closed?
(In reply to Ariel Burone from comment #4) > If there was a back button, it's not there anymore. > Shoulnd't this bug be closed? Not sure what you mean, the back button from the screenshot is still there.
@Ariel, can you please look at comment #5 (I am also seeing the back button, it's properly there) Honza
Sorry. I was looking at another section. That's why I didn't see the button. (and didn't realize there was a screen shot) BTW. I always tough that button was intentionall. How it's supposed to look?
(In reply to Ariel Burone from comment #7) > Sorry. I was looking at another section. That's why I didn't see the button. > (and didn't realize there was a screen shot) > > > BTW. I always tough that button was intentionall. How it's supposed to look? I am not sure if I understand the question. The implementation was done years ago and it looks just like it was designed. I am happy if we can improve the UI, but so far I don't see any suggestions/mockups. Honza
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.