972622 - (CVE-2014-1502) WebGL.compressedTex(Sub)Image2D doesn't call MakeCurrent

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Core :: Graphics: CanvasWebGL, defect)

Description

[Kelsey Gilbert [:jgilbert]]

Ok, this one is potentially dangerous, since it can change the data in another context. It can't steal data, only upload its own data, though.

Maybe a very low likelihood sec-vector?

Comment 1

[Kelsey Gilbert [:jgilbert]]

Attachment: makecur-compressed

Comment 2

[Benoit Jacob [:bjacob] (mostly away)]

Right; what would be a big problem is if we forgot to makecurrent in a WebGL entry point that can retrieve information out of a WebGL context...

Comment 3

[Kelsey Gilbert [:jgilbert]]

(In reply to Benoit Jacob [:bjacob] from comment #2)
> Right; what would be a big problem is if we forgot to makecurrent in a WebGL
> entry point that can retrieve information out of a WebGL context...

You could steal data from other GLContexts, possibly including the compositor. (I think not the compositor if we're on OMTC, though)

Comment 4

[Benoit Jacob [:bjacob] (mostly away)]

Right, the likely attack case is a WebGL context on the main thread stealing data from another WebGL context on the main thread, from a different origin.

Comment 5

[Kelsey Gilbert [:jgilbert]]

I was wrong about what sec-vector meant. This sounds like it's potentially sec-high, since you can potentially inject static images into other running WebGL. The difficulty in doing something targeted with it likely drops it down to sec-moderate, which is what I'll mark this.

The only danger here is if:
The malicious WebGL context can interleave its command stream with another context's rendering loop, but only in that it overwrites a specific texture to something phishy, or similar.
This is baaasically not viable.

It can happen more easily if an victim context renders using a texture without rebinding it, which more or less is never done in anything non-trivial.

Comment 6

[Kelsey Gilbert [:jgilbert]]

This bug is ancient. These are my recommendations for wontfix: Release, ESR24, B2G18, B2G 1.1.

Comment 7

[Kelsey Gilbert [:jgilbert]]

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/b11d40f3ba4b

Comment 8

[Kelsey Gilbert [:jgilbert]]

Comment on attachment 8375877 [details] [diff] [review]
makecur-compressed

NOTE: This flag is now for security issues only. Please see https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/B2G_Landing to better understand the B2G approval process and landings.

[Approval Request Comment]
Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): 728017
User impact if declined: Very unlikely sec concerns brought up in above comments.
Testing completed: Local
Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): none
String or UUID changes made by this patch: none

Comment 9

[Phil Ringnalda (:philor)]

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/b11d40f3ba4b

Comment 10

[Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM][PTO June 24-28]]

Comment on attachment 8375877 [details] [diff] [review]
makecur-compressed

If this is approved and landed on beta, it will be merged to b2g28.

Comment 11

[Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM][PTO June 24-28]]

https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/3cc2d13051d0
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-beta/rev/f8a20613302c

Comment 12

[Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM][PTO June 24-28]]

https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g28_v1_3/rev/f8a20613302c

Comment 13

[Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM][PTO June 24-28]]

https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g26_v1_2/rev/28ab1d8df345

Comment 14

[u279076]

Matt, can you please evaluate if this needs testing before release?