Closed
Bug 980342
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Wrong CSP warning on setTimeout
Categories
(Marketplace Graveyard :: Validation, defect, P3)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WONTFIX
People
(Reporter: clochix, Unassigned)
Details
(Whiteboard: [incorrect_implementation][marketplace-transition])
When validating a packaged application, I get warnings about possible CSP violations on call to setTimeout, even if the first parameter of the call is a function.
See https://marketplace.firefox.com/developers/upload/878076a27c36471ba0df6171e3f569e2 for the full report (I know that some warning are accurate, but others not).
Updated•11 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Updated•11 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [incorrect_implementation]
Updated•11 years ago
|
Component: Developer Pages → Validation
Comment 1•11 years ago
|
||
The code looks like this:
function foo(handler) {
setTimeout(handler, 0);
}
The validator doesn't know if "handler" will be a variable or a function, so it warns. Not sure what we can do to avoid it.
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
This bug affects me too. I'm using ampersand-router as a dependency in my app, which has a piece of code that looks like this:
this._checkUrlInterval = setInterval(this.checkUrl, this.interval);
//...
checkUrl: function (e) {
var current = this.getFragment();
if (current === this.fragment) return false;
this.loadUrl();
}
So this.checkUrl is clearly a function, but it still fails validation. Does that mean the validator doesn't do any real static code analysis? Is there any way to get around this short of changing the dependency?
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Sorry, I guess this.checkUrl in my example above could theoretically be changed to something else, so there's no way to know for sure ahead of time. Still, I wish there were a way to get around this, especially since it comes up in a third-party dependency and not my own code.
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
You summed up the issue :) It's just a warning though.
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Whiteboard: [incorrect_implementation] → [incorrect_implementation][marketplace-transition]
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•