201046 - Rename Elapsed Time to Time Elapsed

Status: VERIFIED FIXED

(Core Graveyard :: File Handling, enhancement)

Description

[Pham]

User-Agent:       Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030407 Phoenix/0.5+
Build Identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4a) Gecko/20030407 Phoenix/0.5+

The Download Dialog should say Time Elapsed to be consistent with Download Manager

Reproducible: Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Comment 1

[timeless]

.

Comment 2

[Andreas Kunz]

Well, this is not one of Mozilla's most urgent problems.
But I'll confirm it because it looks a bit better ("Time" being in the first
position at both occurrances).

Comment 3

[Andreas Kunz]

Attachment: patch

Change the wording.

Comment 4

[Andreas Kunz]

Comment on attachment 120075 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

Requesting review from [e-mail].
Please tell me if sr= is needed for such a small change.
And I have no CVS write access, so...

Comment 5

[Ian Neal]

Does progress dialog make use of the embedded dtd file or the one under the xfer
component? I've a feeling both might need to be patched.

Comment 6

[Christian :Biesinger (don't email me, ping me on IRC)]

Comment on attachment 120075 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

law is gone... requesting review from someone who still works on mozilla

Comment 7

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

Comment on attachment 120075 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

Actually, biesi, would you mind doing the r=?  The change is good as far as I
am concerned.  Ian, please poke me for checkin via email once this has r=.

We should also consider removing downloadProgress.dtd -- it seems unused...

Comment 8

[Ian Neal]

Can I refer people back to comment#5, this patches the nsProgressDialog.dtd
under embedding but not downloadProgress.dtd under xpfe/components/xfer. Surely
this patch should address both?

Comment 9

[Christian :Biesinger (don't email me, ping me on IRC)]

Ian: see comment 7 and
http://lxr.mozilla.org/seamonkey/search?string=downloadProgress.dtd, that file
seems unused

Comment 10

[Christian :Biesinger (don't email me, ping me on IRC)]

oh... it seems like downloadProgress.dtd was made unused by the removal of
nsProgressDlg.{xul,js} in bug 211169... sorry for not noticing that :/

Comment 11

[Ian Neal]

Hmmm, so that was the rug that went from under me.

Comment 12

[Boris Zbarsky [:bzbarsky]]

Patch checked in.  r/sr=me to remove that unused file, biesi....

Comment 13

[Christian :Biesinger (don't email me, ping me on IRC)]

ok, that file is gone, together with the jar.mn entry for it

Comment 14

[Andreas Kunz]

v