(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #149) > well - that's really unexpected; still I suppose that it'd be better if TB erased > that key instead of nullifying it as I did. I did that because of lack of knowledge > in the installer technology used, sorry for that; I knew that we should not let it stay 1 > - which is correct anyway. If you know how to (and actually do) change that to removal, it would be great. Filed bug 1545362 for it.
Bug 1530820 Comment 152 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #149) > well - that's really unexpected; still I suppose that it'd be better if TB erased > that key instead of nullifying it as I did. I did that because of lack of knowledge > in the installer technology used, sorry for that; I knew that we should not let it stay 1 - > which is correct anyway. If you know how to (and actually do) change that to removal, it would be great. Filed bug 1545362 for it.