(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM] from comment #13) > IIUC, bug 1836962 and bug 1833091 implemented the changes referenced in comment 12? Can we set the dependencies? We usually don't link non secure bugs to secure bugs. > Also, those landed in 116/117 - do we need to do any follow-up work for ESR115 still? bug 1704420 is the right one for highlighting and it's fixed in 115. bug 1833091 is no longer related to this issue. That was the initial plan but it ended up being really hard, so we ended up with bug 1836962. So it's not necessary. Bug 1836962 may be interesting to uplift, yes. I'll ping Marc about that.
Bug 1690979 Comment 14 Edit History
Note: The actual edited comment in the bug view page will always show the original commenter’s name and original timestamp.
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM] from comment #13) > IIUC, bug 1836962 and bug 1833091 implemented the changes referenced in comment 12? Can we set the dependencies? We usually don't link non secure bugs to secure bugs. > Also, those landed in 116/117 - do we need to do any follow-up work for ESR115 still? bug 1704420 is the right one for highlighting and it's fixed in 115. bug 1833091 is no longer related to this issue. That was the initial plan but it ended up being really hard, so we ended up with bug 1836962. So it's not necessary to uplift that work. Bug 1836962 may be interesting to uplift, yes. I'll ping Marc about that.