Closed Bug 1002889 Opened 11 years ago Closed 7 years ago

Port bugzilla.org static content over to WordPress

Categories

(Bugzilla :: bugzilla.org, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED WONTFIX

People

(Reporter: mcote, Assigned: techmessiah)

References

Details

Once we have the Word Press site up, we need to port all static content from bugzilla.org over, that is, everything except the installation list ("Who Uses Bugzilla?") and the paid support list.
Assignee: website → techmessiah
A few things I need - 1. What do I do with Releases and Security Advisories? There are a lot of them, and I need to know how important they are. Can I copy over the most recent ones and upload the older ones as html files into WP (or same place as Documentation. See #2)? I can indeed port them all over into WP posts, I just want to make sure I'm not spending time on old, rarely viewed content that could be handled differently. 2. Documentation: These folders need to be hosted somewhere for me to link to them. They have specific css/images/supporting files and cannot just be uploaded into WP. 3. The menu on the default Moz theme is awful. See exhibit A: http://wpms.mozilla-community.org/bugzilla/ I need access to other themes and/or this theme needs to be fixed. I can also use Twenty Fourteen, but it doesn't really fit. 4. What do you want me to do about the https setting in WP? Do I check it for all pages? Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(logan)
Reassigning the needinfo to Tanner, as he is stepping in for me for a few months while I'm busy.
Flags: needinfo?(logan) → needinfo?(tanner.sumo.bugs)
Going to needinfo :justdave on the first point. Also CCing other Bugzilla officials. To clarify the second point, we're wondering if there's some space somewhere for static files to be served and linked to from WP, since they won't fit into WP neatly.
Flags: needinfo?(justdave)
Can't the docs be linked to readthedocs?
(In reply to Simon Green from comment #4) > Can't the docs be linked to readthedocs? That is only for 5.0+. We need to be able to host the static HTML for the 4.4 and earlier docs we currently have. (In reply to techmessiah from comment #1) > 1. What do I do with Releases and Security Advisories? There are a lot of > them, and I need to know how important they are. Can I copy over the most > recent ones and upload the older ones as html files into WP (or same place > as Documentation. See #2)? I can indeed port them all over into WP posts, I > just want to make sure I'm not spending time on old, rarely viewed content > that could be handled differently. We need them all to be available for reference somehow. They don't necessarily need to be actual posts (just maybe the last year or so can be) but need to be easily accessible. > 2. Documentation: These folders need to be hosted somewhere for me to link > to them. They have specific css/images/supporting files and cannot just be > uploaded into WP. Above comment. dkl
a primary use-case for all the old release notes is they are required reading when upgrading old versions of bugzilla -- the process is basically "read every relnote between your version and the one you're upgrading to".
For any static content, we can upload it to our CDN partner, MaxCDN. Are you okay with adding a "This content is hosted at MaxCDN" link to the bottom of stuff (I can handle it), just a small link. They provide us with free usage, so it's nice to add a link as much as we can.
(In reply to techmessiah from comment #1) > 2. Documentation: These folders need to be hosted somewhere for me to link > to them. They have specific css/images/supporting files and cannot just be > uploaded into WP. I'm trying to work out the best way to do this. My current thought is to just have a bucket on S3 and serve from there, but I'm not sure if that's the best way. Another thing we could do is host on MaxCDN, we have a sponsored unlimited account there, so that may be better than paying to use S3. > > 3. The menu on the default Moz theme is awful. See exhibit A: > http://wpms.mozilla-community.org/bugzilla/ I need access to other themes > and/or this theme needs to be fixed. I can also use Twenty Fourteen, but it > doesn't really fit. Not quite sure what to do about this one... The source is at https://github.com/mozilla/One-Mozilla-blog/, so we can always hack on that if needed. > > 4. What do you want me to do about the https setting in WP? Do I check it > for all pages? Unless bugzilla.org has its own SSL certificate, no. You'll always login from wpms.mozilla-community.org.
Flags: needinfo?(tanner.sumo.bugs)
Curious if you have any further thoughts on S3 vs MaxCDN. Also, could we use our own theme? Probably easier than trying to fix the weirdness in the current one.
Flags: needinfo?(tanner.sumo.bugs)
Not to speak for Tanner, but MaxCDN is likely the best option here. You can use your own theme, but we will need to test the theme in a dev environment beforehand, and if using MaxCDN, we will want to add a footer link, no different to anything else in the site stating that the site is "Accelerated by MaxCDN". Mozilla Branding are okay with this, just up to you.
Summary: Port static content over to Word Press → Port static content over to WordPress
What :tad said.
Flags: needinfo?(tanner.sumo.bugs)
I think I found a theme that might work. Can we get "Decode" By ScottSmith installed? It's super simple. MaxCDN sure - Will I have ftp access?
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Flags: needinfo?(tanner.sumo.bugs)
I am willing to help with moving the code over to wordpress for the docs maybe even move them to the wiki
We have a contributor working on this; she's just waiting for some answers to questions in comment 12.
Let's pause for a bit. I'm not convinced MaxCDN is the right solution. Currently discussing the appropriate Wordpress Multisite architecture as it pertains to Amazon. Integration into Amazon primitives such as S3 & Cloudfront might be a better approach (and as such you can have access to the S3 bucket if needed).
Depends on: WPMS
I've received almost no status updates on WPMS in several weeks, so I'm not sure what the status of this is. Tad would know better than I would.
Flags: needinfo?(tanner.sumo.bugs) → needinfo?(tom)
WPMS works. Using Cloudfront instead of MaxCDN. I'd suggest we can start doing this. Let's open a community it bug, I'll do that. You can use this bug for moving your content, we'll implement our bit in another bug :)
Flags: needinfo?(tom)
(In reply to Tanner Filip [:tanner] from comment #16) > I've received almost no status updates on WPMS in several weeks, so I'm not @tanner - are you able to join the Monday meeting? That's where we've been talking about WPMS and providing updates. Meeting notes are also online.
Summary: Port static content over to WordPress → Port bugzilla.org static content over to WordPress
Justdave added a relevant comment to bug 891260. Gerv
It looks like Community IT are no longer setting up WPMS (bug 971411 comment 6). So what do we do now? Gerv
We have our own WordPress; I was just thinking yesterday that apparently we didn't announce it anywhere: https://bugzilla.mofostaging.net/ Still very much in progress.
WPMS isn't happening, but a wordpress solution will be available We're looking into a managed hosting solution that can power every type of site, should hopefully have final details on what we're doing in early May
(In reply to Gervase Markham [:gerv] from comment #20) > It looks like Community IT are no longer setting up WPMS (bug 971411 comment > 6). > > So what do we do now? Just to clarify, Wordpress Multisite isn't the current direction. We are, however, looking at a Wordpress-as-a-Service. https://wiki.mozilla.org/IT/Community/WG/WordpressMS has some information on one idea (the other being a hosted service like Rackspace Cloud Sites).
The last few comments seem to have overlapped with each other and don't quite all line up. Comment 21 has accurate current status. The underlying modules needed to accomplish our custom pages are all in place, we just need the content migrated at this point. There was a short effort to start migrating content but it stalled and hasn't been touched in several months. This doesn't cover the docs... we could probably host the older versions of the docs on landfill and provide redirects if we had to.
Flags: needinfo?(justdave)
(In reply to Dave Miller [:justdave] (justdave@bugzilla.org) from comment #24) > The last few comments seem to have overlapped with each other and don't > quite all line up. > > Comment 21 has accurate current status. The underlying modules needed to > accomplish our custom pages are all in place, we just need the content > migrated at this point. justdave: can you elaborate more on what that means? How do we migrate content? Does it mean creating new pages by hand on the staging Wordpress instance and copying the content in? How will data make it from the staging Wordpress to the production one? Is there any more automated way of creating a lot of pages on a Wordpress? > There was a short effort to start migrating content > but it stalled and hasn't been touched in several months. Who was doing that? > This doesn't > cover the docs... we could probably host the older versions of the docs on > landfill and provide redirects if we had to. That sounds like a reasonable solution if it is hard to just upload a directory of HTML files and say "serve this". Gerv
justdave: can you provide updated status here? https://bugzilla.mofostaging.net/ seems to have disappeared. It would be good to move to something more maintainable, even if it's only Github Pages. Gerv
Flags: needinfo?(justdave)
Since the current site is static, we could just serve it as a github page. Updating it would look like: checkout repo build content locally commit built content to gh-pages branch.
We could do that, but it would be nice to ditch the existing website build system in favour of something more standard, flexible and extensible. Gerv
We're going for Github Pages instead - see http://bugzilla.github.io/ . Gerv
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Flags: needinfo?(justdave)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.