Closed Bug 1005685 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Reduce incremental cycle collection slice budget

Categories

(Core :: XPCOM, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1097240

People

(Reporter: mccr8, Unassigned)

References

(Blocks 1 open bug)

Details

With bug 1005500, bug 861449, and bug 1005396, I see greatly reduced pause times for ScanRoots/CollectWhite (from about 13ms to 6ms) so it might be worth reducing the ICC slice budget from 10ms to 5 or 6ms.
Would we have a different value on b2g?  I assume the mobile devices would take longer to do the same amount of work.
On mobile graphs should be also smaller, usually.
Yeah, B2G is multiprocess, and isn't going to have as much open at a time anyways due to having less memory, so each CC graph will be much smaller.  That said, I should really file a bug for letting the budget be set by a pref so it can be easily tuned if needed.
Oh, I already have one, bug 957416.
I'd say this is a dup of bug 1097240.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.