1019513 - Write copy for "Infrastructure: Maker" badge detail page

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Webmaker Graveyard :: Badges, defect)

Comment 1

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

Graphic design: Bug 1007809

Comment 2

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

Attachment: https://etherpad.mozilla.org/weblit-competency-infrastructure

Comment 3

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

Updated with re-scoped criteria/description: https://etherpad.mozilla.org/weblit-competency-infrastructure

Comment 4

[Matt Thompson (@OpenMatt :OpenMatt)]

@ doug: some feedback

@ Michelle: can you review? 

1)  This line didn't seem to fit:
"Be creative and show your understanding of navigation in your own way!"

2) "Some examples of Infrastructure-related projects:"

This is great content. But I don't think we want to do stuff like this on the badge detail page. I think these should just go on the Infrastructure /resources page instead. That's what those pages are for. 

* Seems like it still needs a line explaining what kind of artefact you can submit:

"You could submit a blog post, a project you made using Webmaker tools like Thimble or Popcorn, or anything you made on the web."

* This is a bit confusing:

Note: that you'll need to prove  that *you* made or remixed it, so you might want to use the same username/avatar as your Webmaker profile.

How would you do that for a blog post you wrote? Or for a project you created using a third-party tool? Let's just take it out?

Comment 5

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

Hi Matt,

1. Thanks for that. While you were editing I was removing the request for you and Michelle to review after a conversation with Laura this morning! I realised I need to re-scope. 

2. We need examples as when coming up with an assessment, you have to think about how it's going to be assessed. In this case, the person submitting a project needs to know what 'counts' as a project, and so does the assessor. Without examples, it's difficult to ascertain how 'big' the thing that they have to submit is. If this isn't on the badge detail page, then people don't know what kind of thing to submit.

3. See answer 2. ;-)

4. Yes, we can take it out (it confused Laura too!) All I meant was that the person needs to be ready to show that while they're 'user: foo' on webmaker.org they're 'user: bar' on a different site. Probably too confusing.

Give me until tomorrow and I'll have them all done.

Comment 6

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

Actually, on second thoughts: 

2. You're right. Let's just link back to the resources page for examples. 

I'll update the etherpads now.

Comment 7

[Matt Thompson (@OpenMatt :OpenMatt)]

Updated:
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/weblit-competency-infrastructure

Doug: work for you?

* Also: we agreed that we can adjust the bar for each competency. This one is more technical, so you can just demonstrate knowledge of any one of the criteria. Whereas others might require more.

Comment 8

[Matt Thompson (@OpenMatt :OpenMatt)]

* The draft looks good -- Doug, let's use this as a template for all others.

* Can you update the other ones based on this?

Comment 9

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

Yep. #onit

Comment 10

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

Comment on attachment 8433341 [details]
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/weblit-competency-infrastructure

https://etherpad.mozilla.org/weblit-maker-infrastructure

Comment 11

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

Comment on attachment 8433341 [details]
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/weblit-competency-infrastructure

https://etherpad.mozilla.org/weblit-maker-infrastructure

Comment 12

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

Comment on attachment 8433341 [details]
https://etherpad.mozilla.org/weblit-competency-infrastructure

>https://etherpad.mozilla.org/weblit-maker-infrastructure

Comment 13

[[:dajbelshaw] Doug Belshaw]

<throws hands in the air>

I obviously don't know WTF I am doing here.

Matt, Michelle: could you review please?

Comment 14

[Matt Thompson (@OpenMatt :OpenMatt)]

done