Closed Bug 1022781 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Unnecessary plural form in Conference Call header

Categories

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Dialer, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

(b2g-v2.1 fixed)

RESOLVED FIXED
2.0 S4 (20june)
Tracking Status
b2g-v2.1 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: flod, Assigned: flod)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

See bug 977054 https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/6e7a17b0c93f90ad7cc25db957f948472ab436dc +conference={[ plural(n) ]} +conference[one] = Conference ({{ n }}) +conference[two] = Conference ({{ n }}) +conference[few] = Conference ({{ n }}) +conference[many] = Conference ({{ n }}) +conference[other] = Conference ({{ n }}) This is not a plural form: conference doesn't change based on the number of participants, so the plural form is unnecessary. This should be replace by one string with a placeholder # LOCALIZATION NOTE(conferencecall): {{n}} represents the number of # participants in the group call. conferencecall = Conference ({{n}})
Are you sure that this is true for all languages/locales?
{{n}} refers to participants, not conferences. If there are different translations, I assume it happens because people thought the number was related to "call" (previous string was "Group call"), not participants. Also, partially unrelated: as a general rule, always add all 6 plural cases, even if they don't make any sense (zero), because it makes tools happy.
Happy to take a patch for this Flod. ;)
Attached file Pull request on Github
Tests run fine locally, problem is that I can't test this patch on a real phone. I call 1 number, add a second one, then touch the icon to merge calls but I get "Unable to merge call". I tried several combinations (2 SIMs same company + landline, 3 SIMs from 2 different operators) but I always get the same message.
Attachment #8439050 - Flags: review?(anthony)
Attached image Patched Keon
OK, I discovered that conference call needs to be enabled with my operator.
Comment on attachment 8439050 [details] [review] Pull request on Github Thanks! Once it lands, we should ask for 2.0 approval I guess.
Attachment #8439050 - Flags: review?(anthony) → review+
Assignee: nobody → francesco.lodolo
Blocks: 977054
The current strings don't prevent to have a correct localization, you simply need to repeat the same translation multiple times. So it's better to not break string freeze on 2.0 for this and let it ride the trains.
Keywords: checkin-needed
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Keywords: checkin-needed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → 2.0 S4 (20june)
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: