From Bugzilla Helper: User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.5) Gecko/20011011 BuildID: 2001101117 An animated GIF which is supposed to display in red (and does so in Netscape 4.77) is completely transparently where the red is supposed to be. Reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. Point Browser to http://www.michael-noakes.co.uk/ 2. Watch image below "View here" Actual Results: Animation starts, but where it should be red, it is transparent Expected Results: Animation should've been in red.
imagelib. For reference, with trunk build 2001-10-18-08 on linux I cannot see the animated gif at all!
Assignee: pchen → pavlov
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Component: XP Apps → ImageLib
Ever confirmed: true
OS: Windows 98 → All
QA Contact: sairuh → tpreston
worksforme (: 2001101808 redhat 7.0+
I still see this behavior on Win XP build 2001110209
Is there any news about this ? It is one of the bug that makes advocacy of Mozilla harder.
Still there, win98SE, 2002010403. The .gif looks fine in Irfanview and IE5.5
WFM linux, cvs tip... setting pp keyword
Created attachment 68348 [details] testcase (image in question with different background colors) build 2002020603 win32 trunk still seeing the bug. Could this be a dup?
taking this bug from pavlov
Assignee: pavlov → nivedita
Created attachment 70257 [details] [diff] [review] patch file for fixing the transparent animated gif The disposal method of animated the gif was DISPOSE_NOT_SPECIFIED, and here the BuildCompositeMask was not being called which correctly handles the masking of overlay frame and its background. Since DISPOSE_KEEP was already doing this. Hence clubbed the cases of DISPOSE_NOT_SPECIFIED and DISPOSE_KEEP
is the patch ready for review?
yes, it is ready for review.
Whiteboard: [needs r=] → [needs review/superreview]
Comment on attachment 70257 [details] [diff] [review] patch file for fixing the transparent animated gif r=pavlov
Attachment #70257 - Flags: review+
Whiteboard: [needs review/superreview] → [needs superreview]
WFM without the patch - red signature, transparent background.
Can you please verify the given test case, where in differnt back ground colors are used. On the white back ground, the red signature is clear, but when against the other background color, the signature appears in red+background color. That is reason why BuildCompositeMask is needed.
The test case id=68348 happens on Windows platform.
Without patch transparency appears correct on all backgrounds in the testcase.
This test case is valid for Windows platform.
tor, it doesn't work in windows.. just open IE and take a look at the difference, there is no animation and the background color of the signature is not the correct color even on the URL testcase, and the attached testcase. Nivedita, this is definitely not fixed without the patch on windows 2000; build 2002-03-01-03.
Comment on attachment 70257 [details] [diff] [review] patch file for fixing the transparent animated gif sr=tor
Attachment #70257 - Flags: superreview+
Comment on attachment 70257 [details] [diff] [review] patch file for fixing the transparent animated gif a=asa (on behalf of drivers) for checkin to the 0.9.9 branch and the 1.0 trunk
Attachment #70257 - Flags: approval+
Fixed with chekin on trunk C:\mozilla\modules\libpr0n\src>cvs commit cvs commit: Examining . Checking in imgContainer.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/src/imgContainer.cpp,v <-- imgContainer.cpp new revision: 1.27; previous revision: 1.26 done On 099 branch C:\moz099\mozilla\modules\libpr0n\src>cvs commit cvs commit: Examining . Checking in imgContainer.cpp; /cvsroot/mozilla/modules/libpr0n/src/imgContainer.cpp,v <-- imgContainer.cpp new revision: 220.127.116.11; previous revision: 1.26 done
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 17 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.