Closed
Bug 1058490
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
B2G NFC: Add a sessionHelper in Chrome Process
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: NFC, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
2.1 S5 (26sep)
People
(Reporter: allstars.chh, Assigned: allstars.chh)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [p=2])
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
10.65 KB,
patch
|
dimi
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We could have a SessionHelper that could help us know whether this session is for a Tag or for a Device.
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
I assume this should be a stateless helper. It might have one method which would return session type tag/device/unknown or two methods isTag/isDevice returning true/false. Both solutions would take message from NfcService as the argument.
Yoshi is this proposition ok with you?
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
ah, sorry, I already have some WIP patch and is about to be finished.
So taking this bug back
Assignee: kmioduszewski → allstars.chh
Flags: needinfo?(allstars.chh)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8487065 -
Attachment description: WIP Patch → Patch
Attachment #8487065 -
Flags: review?(dlee)
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8487065 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch
Review of attachment 8487065 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Just one question for this patch, others looks good to me
::: dom/nfc/gonk/Nfc.js
@@ +333,5 @@
> + },
> +
> + unregisterSession: function unregisterSession(sessionId) {
> + if (sessionId != this.id) {
> + dump("Unpaired sessionId: " + sessionId + "current Id:" + this.id);
should we return here or it is your intend to just print debug message ?
Attachment #8487065 -
Flags: review?(dlee) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
As discussed with Dimi,
SessionHelper should be able to handle multiple current sessions, updated patch to meet this requirement
Attachment #8487065 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8493647 -
Flags: review?(dlee)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review]
Patch v2.
Review of attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Yoshi,
I would like to discuss something about getCurrentToken. For multiple session case,
we will only compare one of the token in tokenMap for like // Sanity check on sessionToken & NFC:CheckSessionToken
Is that the behavior we want ?
::: dom/nfc/gonk/Nfc.js
@@ +343,5 @@
> + for (let id in this.tokenMap) {
> + if (this.tokenMap[id]) {
> + return this.tokenMap[id].token;
> + }
> + }
could be simplified using |for each|
for each (let item in this.tokenMap) {
if (item) { <-- unless it is possible to have null value in tokenMap
return item.token;
}
}
same as below
@@ +358,5 @@
> + return 0;
> + },
> +
> + isP2PSession: function isP2PSession(id) {
> + return (this.tokenMap[id] != null) && this.tokenMap[id].isP2P;
suggest use |this.tokenMap[id] && this.tokenMap[id].isP2P| because of it will be a little bit more intuitive
Attachment #8493647 -
Flags: review?(dlee)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dimi Lee[:dimi][:dlee] from comment #5)
> Comment on attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review]
> Patch v2.
>
> Review of attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review]:
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hi Yoshi,
> I would like to discuss something about getCurrentToken. For multiple
> session case,
> we will only compare one of the token in tokenMap for like // Sanity check
> on sessionToken & NFC:CheckSessionToken
>
> Is that the behavior we want ?
>
I think I'll change getCurrentToken to
- IsSessionValid(sessionToken) to check the sessionToken is still valid.
- HasOngoingSession to check currently there's ongoing session right now.
> ::: dom/nfc/gonk/Nfc.js
> @@ +343,5 @@
> > + for (let id in this.tokenMap) {
> > + if (this.tokenMap[id]) {
> > + return this.tokenMap[id].token;
> > + }
> > + }
>
> could be simplified using |for each|
> for each (let item in this.tokenMap) {
> if (item) { <-- unless it is possible to have null value in tokenMap
> return item.token;
> }
> }
>
For each is drecated now.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/for_each...in
> same as below
>
> @@ +358,5 @@
> > + return 0;
> > + },
> > +
> > + isP2PSession: function isP2PSession(id) {
> > + return (this.tokenMap[id] != null) && this.tokenMap[id].isP2P;
>
> suggest use |this.tokenMap[id] && this.tokenMap[id].isP2P| because of it
> will be a little bit more intuitive
if this.tokenMap[id] is undefined then this function will return 'undefined', not 'false'.
So I added "!= null" here
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Yoshi Huang[:allstars.chh] from comment #6)
> (In reply to Dimi Lee[:dimi][:dlee] from comment #5)
> > Comment on attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review]
> > Patch v2.
> >
> > Review of attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review]:
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Hi Yoshi,
> > I would like to discuss something about getCurrentToken. For multiple
> > session case,
> > we will only compare one of the token in tokenMap for like // Sanity check
> > on sessionToken & NFC:CheckSessionToken
> >
> > Is that the behavior we want ?
> >
> I think I'll change getCurrentToken to
> - IsSessionValid(sessionToken) to check the sessionToken is still valid.
> - HasOngoingSession to check currently there's ongoing session right now.
>
>
> > ::: dom/nfc/gonk/Nfc.js
> > @@ +343,5 @@
> > > + for (let id in this.tokenMap) {
> > > + if (this.tokenMap[id]) {
> > > + return this.tokenMap[id].token;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> >
> > could be simplified using |for each|
> > for each (let item in this.tokenMap) {
> > if (item) { <-- unless it is possible to have null value in tokenMap
> > return item.token;
> > }
> > }
> >
> For each is drecated now.
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/
> for_each...in
Thanks for the info
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8493647 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8494333 -
Flags: review?(dlee)
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8494333 [details] [diff] [review]
patch v3.
Review of attachment 8494333 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Looks good, thanks
Attachment #8494333 -
Flags: review?(dlee) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [p=2]
Target Milestone: --- → 2.1 S5 (26sep)
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•