Closed
Bug 1058490
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
B2G NFC: Add a sessionHelper in Chrome Process
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: NFC, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
2.1 S5 (26sep)
People
(Reporter: allstars.chh, Assigned: allstars.chh)
References
Details
(Whiteboard: [p=2])
Attachments
(1 file, 2 obsolete files)
10.65 KB,
patch
|
dimi
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We could have a SessionHelper that could help us know whether this session is for a Tag or for a Device.
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
I assume this should be a stateless helper. It might have one method which would return session type tag/device/unknown or two methods isTag/isDevice returning true/false. Both solutions would take message from NfcService as the argument. Yoshi is this proposition ok with you?
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
ah, sorry, I already have some WIP patch and is about to be finished. So taking this bug back
Assignee: kmioduszewski → allstars.chh
Flags: needinfo?(allstars.chh)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8487065 -
Attachment description: WIP Patch → Patch
Attachment #8487065 -
Flags: review?(dlee)
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8487065 [details] [diff] [review] Patch Review of attachment 8487065 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Just one question for this patch, others looks good to me ::: dom/nfc/gonk/Nfc.js @@ +333,5 @@ > + }, > + > + unregisterSession: function unregisterSession(sessionId) { > + if (sessionId != this.id) { > + dump("Unpaired sessionId: " + sessionId + "current Id:" + this.id); should we return here or it is your intend to just print debug message ?
Attachment #8487065 -
Flags: review?(dlee) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
As discussed with Dimi, SessionHelper should be able to handle multiple current sessions, updated patch to meet this requirement
Attachment #8487065 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8493647 -
Flags: review?(dlee)
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review] Patch v2. Review of attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Yoshi, I would like to discuss something about getCurrentToken. For multiple session case, we will only compare one of the token in tokenMap for like // Sanity check on sessionToken & NFC:CheckSessionToken Is that the behavior we want ? ::: dom/nfc/gonk/Nfc.js @@ +343,5 @@ > + for (let id in this.tokenMap) { > + if (this.tokenMap[id]) { > + return this.tokenMap[id].token; > + } > + } could be simplified using |for each| for each (let item in this.tokenMap) { if (item) { <-- unless it is possible to have null value in tokenMap return item.token; } } same as below @@ +358,5 @@ > + return 0; > + }, > + > + isP2PSession: function isP2PSession(id) { > + return (this.tokenMap[id] != null) && this.tokenMap[id].isP2P; suggest use |this.tokenMap[id] && this.tokenMap[id].isP2P| because of it will be a little bit more intuitive
Attachment #8493647 -
Flags: review?(dlee)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Dimi Lee[:dimi][:dlee] from comment #5) > Comment on attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review] > Patch v2. > > Review of attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Hi Yoshi, > I would like to discuss something about getCurrentToken. For multiple > session case, > we will only compare one of the token in tokenMap for like // Sanity check > on sessionToken & NFC:CheckSessionToken > > Is that the behavior we want ? > I think I'll change getCurrentToken to - IsSessionValid(sessionToken) to check the sessionToken is still valid. - HasOngoingSession to check currently there's ongoing session right now. > ::: dom/nfc/gonk/Nfc.js > @@ +343,5 @@ > > + for (let id in this.tokenMap) { > > + if (this.tokenMap[id]) { > > + return this.tokenMap[id].token; > > + } > > + } > > could be simplified using |for each| > for each (let item in this.tokenMap) { > if (item) { <-- unless it is possible to have null value in tokenMap > return item.token; > } > } > For each is drecated now. https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/for_each...in > same as below > > @@ +358,5 @@ > > + return 0; > > + }, > > + > > + isP2PSession: function isP2PSession(id) { > > + return (this.tokenMap[id] != null) && this.tokenMap[id].isP2P; > > suggest use |this.tokenMap[id] && this.tokenMap[id].isP2P| because of it > will be a little bit more intuitive if this.tokenMap[id] is undefined then this function will return 'undefined', not 'false'. So I added "!= null" here
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Yoshi Huang[:allstars.chh] from comment #6) > (In reply to Dimi Lee[:dimi][:dlee] from comment #5) > > Comment on attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review] > > Patch v2. > > > > Review of attachment 8493647 [details] [diff] [review]: > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Hi Yoshi, > > I would like to discuss something about getCurrentToken. For multiple > > session case, > > we will only compare one of the token in tokenMap for like // Sanity check > > on sessionToken & NFC:CheckSessionToken > > > > Is that the behavior we want ? > > > I think I'll change getCurrentToken to > - IsSessionValid(sessionToken) to check the sessionToken is still valid. > - HasOngoingSession to check currently there's ongoing session right now. > > > > ::: dom/nfc/gonk/Nfc.js > > @@ +343,5 @@ > > > + for (let id in this.tokenMap) { > > > + if (this.tokenMap[id]) { > > > + return this.tokenMap[id].token; > > > + } > > > + } > > > > could be simplified using |for each| > > for each (let item in this.tokenMap) { > > if (item) { <-- unless it is possible to have null value in tokenMap > > return item.token; > > } > > } > > > For each is drecated now. > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Statements/ > for_each...in Thanks for the info
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8493647 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8494333 -
Flags: review?(dlee)
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8494333 [details] [diff] [review] patch v3. Review of attachment 8494333 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Looks good, thanks
Attachment #8494333 -
Flags: review?(dlee) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/b2g-inbound/rev/3a637a2dc1b0 Try: https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Try&rev=3da036abe433
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [p=2]
Target Milestone: --- → 2.1 S5 (26sep)
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/3a637a2dc1b0
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•