Closed
Bug 1067805
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Assertion failure: !IsUninitializedLexical(val), at vm/Interpreter.cpp or Assertion failure: data.s.payload.why == why, at dist/include/js/Value.h
Categories
(Core :: JavaScript Engine, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla35
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox35 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: gkw, Assigned: shu)
References
Details
(Keywords: assertion, regression, testcase, Whiteboard: [jsbugmon:update])
Attachments
(1 file)
5.52 KB,
text/plain
|
Details |
(function() { let x = (function() { return x }()); }()); asserts js debug shell on m-c changeset 3b7921328fc1 without any CLI flags at Assertion failure: !IsUninitializedLexical(val), at vm/Interpreter.cpp. If run with --ion-eager --no-threads, the assertion mutates to Assertion failure: data.s.payload.why == why, at dist/include/js/Value.h. Debug configure flags: CC="clang -Qunused-arguments" CXX="clang++ -Qunused-arguments" AR=ar sh /Users/skywalker/trees/mozilla-central/js/src/configure --target=x86_64-apple-darwin12.5.0 --enable-debug --enable-optimize --enable-nspr-build --enable-more-deterministic --with-ccache --enable-gczeal --enable-debug-symbols --disable-tests autoBisect shows this is probably related to the following changeset: The first bad revision is: changeset: https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7027efe7fae3 user: Shu-yu Guo date: Mon Sep 15 16:30:45 2014 -0700 summary: Bug 1001090 - Part 1: Implement let temporal dead zone in the frontend and interpreter. (r=Waldo) Shu-yu, is bug 1001090 a possible regressor?
Flags: needinfo?(shu)
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
wtf, I had fixed this but pushed a wrong version without the fix (!) Will fix shortly.
Flags: needinfo?(shu)
![]() |
Reporter | |
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
remote: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/ba2fd2f25d4e
![]() |
Reporter | |
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
This landed on m-c: http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ba2fd2f25d4e
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
FWIW, issues like comment 5 are due to bug 1062305. You can work around the bug by making sure you properly assign the bug when you land the patch on inbound. We try to double-check after running mcMerge, but as it's a manual process, it's error-prone as this bug shows. Thanks!
Assignee: nobody → shu
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla35
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•