Closed Bug 1069157 Opened 5 years ago Closed 5 years ago

[PDF Viewer] Update pdf.js in Gaia


(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia, defect)

Gonk (Firefox OS)
Not set


(blocking-b2g:2.0+, b2g-v2.0 verified, b2g-v2.0M fixed, b2g-v2.1 fixed, b2g-v2.2 fixed)

2.1 S9 (21Nov)
blocking-b2g 2.0+
Tracking Status
b2g-v2.0 --- verified
b2g-v2.0M --- fixed
b2g-v2.1 --- fixed
b2g-v2.2 --- fixed


(Reporter: mancas, Assigned: mai)




(3 files)

We need to update the pdf.js version in Gaia to include the changes made in bug 1054643
[Blocking Requested - why for this release]: Blocks a blocker.

Also sorely lacking in an owner...
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.0?
Triage group: Blocking 2.0+ since this blocks a 2.0 blocker
blocking-b2g: 2.0? → 2.0+
(In reply to howie [:howie] from comment #2)
> Triage group: Blocking 2.0+ since this blocks a 2.0 blocker

We have not had movement on this since you last commented on Oct 7th.  This bug is still unassigned.
Assignee: nobody → marina.rodrigueziglesias
Attached file patch v1.0
Hi yuri,
Update pdf.js to version 1.0.931.
Tested manually and seems works fine.
Attachment #8512526 - Flags: review?(ydelendik)
Update of the core pdf.js library in the PR looks good. But I don't see anything related to bug 1054643 (or any viewer changes). If the intent only to update rendering functionality, then r+.
Flags: needinfo?(marina.rodriguez.iglesias)
Hi Yury, 
sorry but when we talked by irc I understood that you only want to update the core funcionality (pdf.js and pdf.worker.js). I've updated the PR to the '1.0.954' version, updating the following files: 

I've tested manually the patch with the browser ( and it seems that it Works fine
Flags: needinfo?(marina.rodriguez.iglesias)
Attachment #8512526 - Flags: review?(ydelendik) → review+
Master: f374ffac17f2a0e04ca85f50c216b22bb22cfa81
Closed: 5 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Please request Gaia v2.0 and v2.1 approval on this when you get a chance.
Flags: needinfo?(marina.rodriguez.iglesias)
Target Milestone: --- → 2.1 S9 (21Nov)
Comment on attachment 8512526 [details] [review]
patch v1.0

[Approval Request Comment]
[Bug caused by] (feature/regressing bug #): feature
[User impact] if declined: outdated version of pdf.js, the patch optimizes the performance and it fixes a few of minor bugs.
[Testing completed]: manually tested
[Risk to taking this patch] (and alternatives if risky): low risk
[String changes made]: No

NOTE: Please see to better understand the B2G approval process and landings.
Flags: needinfo?(marina.rodriguez.iglesias)
Attachment #8512526 - Flags: approval-gaia-v2.1?(release-mgmt)
Attachment #8512526 - Flags: approval-gaia-v2.0?(release-mgmt)
Attachment #8512526 - Flags: approval-gaia-v2.1?(release-mgmt)
Attachment #8512526 - Flags: approval-gaia-v2.1+
Attachment #8512526 - Flags: approval-gaia-v2.0?(release-mgmt)
Attachment #8512526 - Flags: approval-gaia-v2.0+
Requesting QA to help do some exploratory pdf.js testing to ensure things aren't broken.
Keywords: verifyme
Attached file patch for v2.1
Hi Ryan,
Updated the patch for 2.1, the following resources has been renamed.



Tested manually.

Yuri, I don't know if you want to review the patch again.

Best regards, 
Flags: needinfo?(marina.rodriguez.iglesias) → needinfo?(ydelendik)
Attached file patch for v2.0 branch
I've updated the viewer.html to change the resources that they don't exist on v2.0 branch.
Attachment #8524597 - Flags: review?(ydelendik)
For the purpose of tracking blocking bugs lists (2.0 and 2.1), please reopen this bug.
Flags: needinfo?(b.mcb)
(In reply to Marina Rodríguez [:mai] from comment #13)
> Yuri, I don't know if you want to review the patch again.

I don't know gaia differences between 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2. It might take me a while to get up to speed. (You are welcome to pass review to somebody else, who knows the subject)
Flags: needinfo?(ydelendik)
Reopening bug per comment 15
Flags: needinfo?(b.mcb)
Resolution: FIXED → ---
Hi Wilson,
would you mind reviewing if it's correct the library replacements for 2.1 and 2.0 branches? (comment 13)

Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
Yeah the paths in comment 13 look correct.
Flags: needinfo?(wilsonpage)
(In reply to Boaz Dodin from comment #15)
> For the purpose of tracking blocking bugs lists (2.0 and 2.1), please reopen
> this bug.

No, please don't. Bug status tracks landing on master (which this patch did). The status flags track uplifts (and we have numerous bug queries that depend on it which break if that assumption is violated).
Closed: 5 years ago5 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Attachment #8524597 - Flags: review?(ydelendik)
Hello, QA folks,

Please execute following test cases and exploratory testing to see if there is any regression.

OS: Linux → Gonk (Firefox OS)
Hardware: x86_64 → ARM
Hi, Norry,

Can you help assign an engineer to verify this bug?
Please file new bug if you find any issue.

Many thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(fan.luo)
According to comment 22, I run the test case on Flame 2.0 latest build. And I found wontfix bug 825318 according to TCID 6892, and other test cases results are pass. So this bug are verified successfully.

Device: Flame 2.0 build
Build ID               20150527160203
Gaia Revision          5552bf529d3d6775a968942e9afa6c1d4037362c
Gaia Date              2015-05-21 14:42:19
Gecko Revision
Gecko Version          32.0
Device Name            flame
Firmware(Release)      4.4.2
Firmware(Incremental)  eng.cltbld.20150527.192635
Firmware Date          Wed May 27 19:26:44 EDT 2015
Bootloader             L1TC000118D0
Flags: needinfo?(fan.luo)
Keywords: verifyme
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage+]
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.