Closed
Bug 1081157
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
"What is this page" link appears on "blank" version of about:newtab
Categories
(Firefox :: New Tab Page, defect)
Tracking
()
VERIFIED
FIXED
Firefox 36
People
(Reporter: mbrubeck, Assigned: Mardak)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression, ux-control, ux-minimalism)
Attachments
(2 files)
848 bytes,
patch
|
ttaubert
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
824 bytes,
patch
|
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-beta+
Sylvestre
:
approval-mozilla-release+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
Bug 1062256 intentionally added a "What is this page" link to the body of the new tab page.
This link does not make sense when the new tab page is set to "blank" mode. For example, clicking the link says, "When you open a new tab, you'll see tiles...," which is not true when the page is set to blank.
Also, this link adds clutter and distraction and makes the page less "blank" than it was. Having a distraction-free option has long been a goal of the new tab page design, going back to the first iterations 5 years ago:
https://blog.mozilla.org/labs/2009/03/firefox-new-tab-page-cognitive-shield/
Therefore, the "What is this page?" link should be hidden when the "blank" option is selected.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
re: status-firefox33, the UI is turned off for all 33 users but we'll turn it on later in 33.
dcrobot, was your intent of moving the link outside of the menu to have "what is this page" visible on "blank" newtab pages?
Flags: needinfo?(athornburgh)
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8503258 -
Flags: review?(ttaubert)
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8503258 [details] [diff] [review]
v1
Review of attachment 8503258 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------
::: browser/base/content/newtab/newTab.css
@@ +58,5 @@
>
> +#newtab-scrollbox[page-disabled] #newtab-intro-what {
> + opacity: 0;
> + pointer-events: none;
> +}
I think display:none would be better. I can't exactly remember why the grid uses opacity/pointer-events but I think it had something to do with transitions and moving tiles around.
Attachment #8503258 -
Flags: review?(ttaubert) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Points: --- → 2
Yes, Ed, that is correct. That link should remain present for all 3 views (enhanced, classic, blank).
Flags: needinfo?(athornburgh)
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Assignee: nobody → edilee
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 35
Updated•10 years ago
|
Target Milestone: Firefox 35 → Firefox 36
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Aaron from comment #5)
> Yes, Ed, that is correct. That link should remain present for all 3 views
> (enhanced, classic, blank).
Do you have any comment on the reasons given in comment 0 to hide it when "blank" is selected? The text really doesn't make any sense for users who have disabled tiles.
Should this be uplifted to beta/aurora?
After thinking about this further, I agree with you Ed. Let's drop "What is this page?" from the Blank New Tab view.
Reporter | ||
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
[Tracking Requested - why for this release]: Part of the 33.x tiles release.
tracking-firefox33:
--- → ?
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
Approval Request Comment
[Feature/regressing bug #]: Bug 1062256
[User impact if declined]: Users expecting a blank experience will see some text
[Describe test coverage new/current, TBPL]: manual QE verification
[Risks and why]: Low - simple css change similar to existing css rules
[String/UUID change made/needed]: None
Attachment #8506428 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-release?
Attachment #8506428 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8506428 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Flags: qe-verify+
Flags: firefox-backlog+
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8506428 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-release?
Attachment #8506428 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-release+
Attachment #8506428 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta?
Attachment #8506428 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-beta+
Attachment #8506428 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Attachment #8506428 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 12•10 years ago
|
||
Updated•10 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [good first verify]
Comment 13•10 years ago
|
||
I was able to reproduce this bug on Nightly 35.0a1 (2014-10-11), using Windows 7 x64.
Verified fixed on Windows 7 x64, Mac OSX 10.9.5 and Ubuntu 14.04 x86 using Nightly 36.0a1 (2014-10-21), Aurora 35.0a2 (2014-10-21) and Beta 34.0b2 (20141020184313).
This fix can be marked as verified.
[bugday-20141022]
Comment 14•10 years ago
|
||
Updating tracking flags according to comment 13.
Thank you!
Comment 15•10 years ago
|
||
Also verified this on the elder branch, build ID: 20141021103730.
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•