Closed Bug 109144 Opened 24 years ago Closed 24 years ago

mozilla.org needs a favicon.ico

Categories

(www.mozilla.org :: General, enhancement)

enhancement
Not set
normal

Tracking

(Not tracked)

RESOLVED FIXED

People

(Reporter: mw, Assigned: endico)

References

()

Details

Attachments

(13 files)

Per request by Gervase Markham in <3BEAD43B.9000207@mozilla.org>. Let the proposals roll in!
This is my proposal -- the grining Beast of Mozilla, of course.
mozilla do have ears... :o)
A lower case M in the Revolution font, like in the banner.
CCing Gerv because he asked for the bug to be created. It's only fair to spam him as well. Making a diff is somewhat harder, since we're not 100% sure what format we'll end up with in the end. Using a GIF or PNG is good, but then no IE users will ever see it. Yet again we're in a situation where we can do something IE can't. But, the code in the end would be: <LINK REL="SHORTCUT ICON" HREF="http://www.mozilla.org/favicon.XXX"> with the XXX as the final file's extention.
This is an animated FavIcon since Mozilla can make use of multiple formats. This is the Revolution font "m" transitioning in a clock-sweep to the red Mozilla Dino, and then progressing back to the "m" with a clock sweep so the animation is smooth.
Don't forget b.m.o (ant?), bonsai (tree icon?), tinderbox (fire?), lxr (??)
Eek. Animated favicons are a new evil we've unleashed, and I'd rather we didn't encourage them. Moving 'things' at the visual periphery distract the eye and mind from content.
Please - no animated favicons. Gerv
There's an opportunity here to "blame lou" and add <blink> support to animated favicons!
The 'm' from the mozilla-branded moz chrome.
Attached image filled m —
I thought too about the "moz-branding" 'm'. The problem is that the 'm' can be hardly recognized in such a degraded 16x16 icon. The icon I have attached is a filled 'm' like the one on the bottom left corner of the windows but larger. Nevertheless, I still prefer the funnier and colorful attachment 57173 [details]. btw, the selected icon should also replace the search engine icon.
I do like that icon concept, though in this particular implementation the m is rendered too 'fat' for my liking. I prefer the proportions of the icon used in the component bar -- in fact if someone were to rip the 'm' icon from the component bar wholesale, pad it out to 16x16 and submit that, it'd get my vote.
Attached image Star Logo (png) —
I have always been partial to the star logo...
Marking fixed. I used a png image instead of /favicon.ico so unix (and mac?) can use the image in toolbars (bug 109037) <LINK REL="icon" HREF="images/mozilla-16.png" TYPE="image/png"> Used image contributed by Hideki Itoh <hide@pixture.com> a while ago for something else.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
I don't rate that choice overly highly -- it suffers from the problem that many favicons have, which is that it simply looks like an indistinct blob. But beggars can't be choosers, as they say...
Suggestion, update the "about:" URL to include the icon.
Agreed, the filled "m" submission is clear at that resolution, the unfilled "m" suffers from aliasing. Suggest that it's skinnable.
neither "about:" nor "about:mozilla" are on the web site. They are both checked in to the tree and distributed with the browser.
The white background doesn't look so good. Perhaps the background colour should be changed to be transparent or to match colour of the modern theme tabs? Or would this look bad with classic, or in the location bar?
I understand that "about:..." content is local, that's why a local res: URL can be used to point to a local resource (e.g. a skin resource) instead of an HTTP URL for the icon.
...for those browsers without the local "res:" icon, then the "http:" URL could be used. A little javascript could test to check for the local file first. OK, OK, I'm over-engineering. Slap me.
You should all use my machine which has a white url bar in both skins. I'll work on an image with a transparent bg.
Daniel, thanks! that looks pretty good! for the rest of you... it could be worse: http://qualm.mi.org/mozilla/de-bug.html
Cor lumme that's disgusting. =)
Pure transparency will result in bad contrast on different backgrounds. Have a look at <http://www.subotnik.net/tmp/icons/mozilla.html>! It places thre icons on different background colours (this is important at least for skinnability). The first icon ist todays <http://mozilla.org/images/mozilla-16.png> with white background. The second is attachement 57678. The third has a transparent background but I added a half-transparent shining around the image. Remember: The cool stuff about PNG is alpha transparency. Let's use it!
Blocks: 110294
Product: mozilla.org → Websites
Component: www.mozilla.org → General
Product: Websites → www.mozilla.org
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: