1096158 - [FFOS2.0][Woodduck][PLMN][Network]Network operator 2G and 3G display unclearly

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Settings, defect, P1)

Description

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #1096111 +++
 DEFECT DESCRIPTION:
 Network operator list display unclearly
 
  REPRODUCING PROCEDURES:
 1. Menu->Settings->Cellular&Data->Network operators
 2. Turn off Automatic selection
 3. Wait MS searching network
 4. We can notice the Network operators list display unclearly,don't know which is CHN-UNICOM 2G,which is CHN-UNICOM 3G  ===>KO
 
 NOTE: It is OK  on Soul 3.5 FF
 
  EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR:
 Can display clearly
 
  ASSOCIATE SPECIFICATION:
 
  TEST PLAN REFERENCE:
 
  TOOLS AND PLATFORMS USED:
 
  USER IMPACT:
 
  REPRODUCING RATE:
 
  For FT PR, Please list reference mobile's behavior:

Comment 1

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

Hi Wesley,
Gary and I had discussion about this bug and we think it's a valid feature request for m/c. Can you help to nominate feature-b2g? 
If OS team does not have resource, device team can take this since it's been reported by partner. Thanks!

Comment 4

[Gabriele Svelto [:gsvelto]]

Sounds like a settings bug, moving it to that component. Feel free to change this if I'm wrong.

Comment 5

[Wesley Huang [:wesley_huang] (EPM) (NI me)]

I'm not sure how we are going to prioritize this. 
Passing ni to Bruce.

Comment 6

[GaryChen [:GaryChen][:PYChen][:gchen][:陳柏宇]]

Hi Josh,
   We can only show the `mobileConnection` information  what we get form gecko.
   In this case, we got these below information and show `longName` or `shortName` on setting panel[1].
   {
    network:MozMobileNetworkInfo
    longName:"TW Mobile",
    mcc:466,
    mnc:97,
    shortName:"TWM",
    state:"available"
   }

   I am not sure why some device can get more information just like bug 1096111#c2 mentioned, but I suspect their device would return the operator name with `2g` or `3g`. 
   [1]https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/blob/master/apps/settings/js/carrier.js#L501

Comment 7

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

Hi Shawn,
I remenber you mentioned we need to add API from gecko side. Could you please help to check? Thanks!

Comment 8

[shawn ku [:sku]]

Dup. to 1096111.
Parter did this by them self per offline mail.

Comment 9

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

per comment 8 close it.