Closed
Bug 1100386
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
Repurpose servo-lion-r5-001 and servo-lion-r5-002
Categories
(Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard :: CIDuty, task, P2)
Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
CIDuty
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
FIXED
People
(Reporter: rail, Assigned: coop)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
805 bytes,
patch
|
coop
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
We don't use them anymore for servo builds. They can be re-imaged and added to our build pool.
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
Let's split these between build and try:
servo-lion-r5-001 -> bld-lion-r5-095 (build)
servo-lion-r5-002 -> bld-lion-r5-096 (try)
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → coop
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Priority: -- → P2
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Yesterday we discussed the possibility of moving these two machines (and maybe a few others) to a different DC (phx?) to create a small pool as part of our disaster recovery plan.
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Chris Cooper [:coop] from comment #2)
> Yesterday we discussed the possibility of moving these two machines (and
> maybe a few others) to a different DC (phx?) to create a small pool as part
> of our disaster recovery plan.
This probably isn't happening soon. Let's proceed with the move to build/try.
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
this puts both servo machines in try pool as:
bld-lion-r5-095
bld-lion-r5-096
Attachment #8573015 -
Flags: review?(coop)
Comment 5•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8573015 [details] [diff] [review]
150304_mac-try-optimize_servo_bbotcfgs.patch
I should note this patch applies on top of: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=8573011&action=edit
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
I updated slavealloc to show that both 095 and 096 entries are in try pool
Should I delete servo-lion-r5-001 and servo-lion-r5-002 from slavealloc db?
Assignee | ||
Comment 7•10 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Jordan Lund (:jlund) from comment #6)
> I updated slavealloc to show that both 095 and 096 entries are in try pool
>
> Should I delete servo-lion-r5-001 and servo-lion-r5-002 from slavealloc db?
Please do.
Assignee | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Attachment #8573015 -
Flags: review?(coop) → review+
Comment 8•10 years ago
|
||
buildbot-config patch is in production
Comment 9•10 years ago
|
||
I've enabled the these slaves and they have started taking jobs. leaving open till we get a green confirmation.
Deleted old machine rows from slavealloc:
DELETE from slaves WHERE name = "servo-lion-r5-001";
DELETE from slaves WHERE name = "servo-lion-r5-002";
Comment 10•10 years ago
|
||
first job from each looks good, I'll leave them running. Hopefully when I come online tomorrow, that pattern persists :)
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•10 years ago
|
||
One failed build on 095, but that happens sometimes on Try. LGTM.
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•7 years ago
|
Product: Release Engineering → Infrastructure & Operations
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Infrastructure & Operations → Infrastructure & Operations Graveyard
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•