Closed Bug 1110510 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Create proxies for document accessibles

Categories

(Core :: Disability Access APIs, defect)

x86_64
Linux
defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla37

People

(Reporter: tbsaunde, Assigned: tbsaunde)

References

Details

Attachments

(2 files)

I'm not sure if this the cause of bug 1099153, but its certainly a bug. Because document accessibles are created differently from other proxies we need make sure to create proxies there too.
Attachment #8535288 - Flags: review?(surkov.alexander)
Attachment #8535288 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8535288 - Flags: review?(surkov.alexander)
Attachment #8535727 - Flags: review?(surkov.alexander)
Comment on attachment 8535288 [details] [diff] [review] make sure to create proxies for documents Review of attachment 8535288 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- the patch looks reasonable but I do have some lack of knowledge of e10s a11y architecture so it might make sense to ask for another review, it's up to you though ::: accessible/ipc/ProxyAccessible.h @@ +87,5 @@ > > protected: > + ProxyAccessible(DocAccessibleParent* aThisAsDoc) : > + mParent(nullptr), mDoc(aThisAsDoc), mWrapper(0), mID(0), > + mRole(roles::DOCUMENT) generic proxy accessible initialized by document role looks weird
Attachment #8535288 - Attachment is obsolete: false
Comment on attachment 8535727 [details] [diff] [review] make sure to create and destroy proxies for documents Review of attachment 8535727 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ::: accessible/ipc/DocAccessibleParent.cpp @@ +148,5 @@ > + > +void > +DocAccessibleParent::ActorDestroy(ActorDestroyReason aWhy) > +{ > + ProxyDestroyed(this); don't you need similar for DocManager?
Attachment #8535727 - Flags: review?(surkov.alexander) → review+
> ::: accessible/ipc/ProxyAccessible.h > @@ +87,5 @@ > > > > protected: > > + ProxyAccessible(DocAccessibleParent* aThisAsDoc) : > > + mParent(nullptr), mDoc(aThisAsDoc), mWrapper(0), mID(0), > > + mRole(roles::DOCUMENT) > > generic proxy accessible initialized by document role looks weird Its a constructor only used for a subclass which is kind of weird I guess, and its not a fully correct solution, but making documents always have correct role doesn't seem like super urgent problem.
(In reply to alexander :surkov from comment #4) > Comment on attachment 8535727 [details] [diff] [review] > make sure to create and destroy proxies for documents > > Review of attachment 8535727 [details] [diff] [review]: > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > ::: accessible/ipc/DocAccessibleParent.cpp > @@ +148,5 @@ > > + > > +void > > +DocAccessibleParent::ActorDestroy(ActorDestroyReason aWhy) > > +{ > > + ProxyDestroyed(this); > > don't you need similar for DocManager? no, ActorDestroy is called on both root and not root DocAccessible Parents.
yeah, it's just weird, can you pass role as constructor argument?
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla37
Comment on attachment 8535727 [details] [diff] [review] make sure to create and destroy proxies for documents >+DocAccessibleParent::ActorDestroy(ActorDestroyReason aWhy) >+{ >+ ProxyDestroyed(this); >+ MOZ_ASSERT(mChildDocs.IsEmpty(), >+ "why wheren't the child docs destroyed already?"); FWIW, I just pushed a trivial typo fix for this assertion-message (s/wheren't/weren't/): https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/a170277d1c67 (This assertion flew by in my terminalspew, and I tried to find it in the backscroll with my terminal's "find" functionality, but I got no hits because I was spelling it correctly when searching. :) Fixing it so that this doesn't bite anyone else.)
Assignee: nobody → tbsaunde+mozbugs
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: