Closed Bug 1111516 Opened 11 years ago Closed 11 years ago

Implement %TypedArray%.prototype.reverse

Categories

(Core :: JavaScript: Standard Library, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla37

People

(Reporter: 446240525, Assigned: 446240525)

References

Details

(Keywords: dev-doc-complete, Whiteboard: [DocArea=JS])

Attachments

(1 file, 3 obsolete files)

No description provided.
Attached patch bug-1111516-v1.patch (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8537168 - Flags: review?(evilpies)
Attached patch added a missed ) (obsolete) — Splinter Review
Attachment #8537168 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8537168 - Flags: review?(evilpies)
Attachment #8537655 - Flags: review?(evilpies)
Attachment #8537655 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8537655 - Flags: review?(evilpies)
Attachment #8537839 - Flags: review?(evilpies)
Sorry, I will try to review this in 24hours.
Comment on attachment 8537839 [details] [diff] [review] added `if (typeof newGlobal === "function"){...}` Review of attachment 8537839 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Looks perfect, can't really think of anything, but adding a few more step annotations. ::: js/src/builtin/TypedArray.js @@ +175,5 @@ > + // Step 6. > + var middle = std_Math_floor(len / 2); > + > + // Steps 7-8. > + // Omit some steps, since there are no holes in typed arrays. // Especially all the HasProperty/*exists checks always succeed. @@ +177,5 @@ > + > + // Steps 7-8. > + // Omit some steps, since there are no holes in typed arrays. > + for (var lower = 0, upper, temp; lower !== middle; lower++) { > + upper = len - lower - 1; // a. var upper = @@ +178,5 @@ > + // Steps 7-8. > + // Omit some steps, since there are no holes in typed arrays. > + for (var lower = 0, upper, temp; lower !== middle; lower++) { > + upper = len - lower - 1; > + temp = O[lower]; var lowerValue = O[lower]; var upperValue = O[upper]; // We always end up in the j. case O[lower] = .. ... ::: js/src/tests/ecma_6/TypedArray/reverse.js @@ +14,5 @@ > + > + assertDeepEq(constructor.prototype.reverse.length, 0); > + > + assertDeepEq(new constructor().reverse(), new constructor()); > + assertDeepEq(new constructor(1000).reverse(), new constructor(1000)); I think 10 is probably enough.
Attachment #8537839 - Flags: review?(evilpies) → review+
Attachment #8537839 - Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8539002 - Flags: review+
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 11 years ago
Flags: in-testsuite+
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla37
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Creator:
Created:
Updated:
Size: