113815 - i can not write in the tables

Status: RESOLVED INVALID

(Core Graveyard :: Java-Implemented Plugins, defect)

Description

[sleon]

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120
BuildID:    2001112012

this is a homebanking
when i try to fill out the log in form :
account and pin
i can not write
in the previos versions this was possible!!!

Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.https://banking.lbbw.de/
2.move your mouse for 20 sekonds
3.try to type something in the forms

Actual Results:  you are not able to write

Expected Results:  i can write and see what i write
i can delete what i wrote!!!!!

Comment 1

[R.K.Aa.]

WFM, current Linux CVS.

Comment 2

[John Levon]

Reporter can you still see the problem in a recent build ??

Comment 3

[sleon]

Attachment: The unproportional charakters. THey are bigger then tables

Comment 4

[sleon]

I can write now, but comicaly the tables a smaller than charakters i write, I is
very uncomfortable. Under windows i don't have this Problem. I have mozilla 0.9.8.
I have this problem since mozilla 0.9.5 under Linux.

I can post a screenshot, to explain my problem.

Comment 5

[sleon]

OK i posted the screenshot :)

Comment 6

[R.K.Aa.]

*** Bug 122134 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7

[R.K.Aa.]

*** Bug 106910 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 8

[R.K.Aa.]

Those who see this bug (fonts appearing too low in Java forms):
Can you please add information about:

-Full version of JRE
-Whether you still see the bug in the latest builds
-Whether you use xfs or only X to render fonts under Linux

Comment 9

[sleon]

I am using XFree 4.2.0 With Debian Woody.I am using XFS server. I have this
Error since 1 year. Since SuSE Linux 7.1(Xfree 4.0.3 + XFS). Java version
1.31_02 but i see this bug since also since Javaversion 1.30...
What kommically is , is the fact, that at school( they have Debian pottato and
very old pC's[Pentiums 233]) everything looks allright.

THerefore i think that it can depend on XFree86 config.

But what comically is, when i try it at home, i saw this Java-table-draw error
on each distribution i have tryed( Mandrake 8.1 amd 8.2, RedHat 7.2 , Debian
Potao, Debian Woody, SuSE 7.1, SuSE 7.2) whith default prefferences.


Hmm......

Comment 10

[Vadim Berezniker]

I am seeing this too ... but more importantly, doesn't this bug belong to java
and not mozilla?

Comment 11

[sleon]

No!
At school everything looks allright!
And I don't have any such problems with java-plugin


sleon|tuX

Comment 12

[sleon]

I mean at scholl we have Debian Potato.

And mozilla 9.5....

And the same Java-Homebanking page looks fine!!!

This is the problem!!!


:)

Comment 13

[Vadim Berezniker]

I understand that, but I don't think the browser doesn't have any work with
displaying fonts or widgets inside the applet. It's up to the Java plugin to do
it through the OS, no?

Comment 14

[Vadim Berezniker]

Should say:

I understand that, but I don't think the browser has anything to do with
displaying fonts or widgets inside the applet. It's up to the Java plugin to do
it through the OS, no?

(Bugzilla really needs an Edit comment option ... )

Comment 15

[R.K.Aa.]

Java use it's own internal fonts and font-descriptions at times, and there are
different nationalized versions. It would be interesting to know if it it the
exact same version of Java that is installed at reporter's own computer as on
his school computer(s)

Comment 16

[sleon]

I am using Java(TM) Plug-in 1.3.0_01 at school and at home

Comment 17

[sleon]

md5sum jre.xpi
c97510a855a80e3cd2ff91e440d47ca2  jre.xpi

at school and home are the same.

Comment 18

[sleon]

The last j2sdk 1.4 java sun plugin have solved my problem!!!(Java(TM) Plug-in
1.4.0-b92)

Comment 19

[Vadim Berezniker]

I guess I was right. It wasn't a mozilla problem after all.

Marking INVALID then

Comment 20

[R.K.Aa.]

The culprit here and in similar bugs may be a local misconfiguration of Java; 
it needs a fontpath set. See bug 139687

Comment 21

[R.K.Aa.]

*** Bug 146684 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***