As said in bug 1119426 comment 3, our current Latin IME prediction/auto correction mechanism is not suitable for agglutinative languages: Naively brute-force concatenating dictionary words to form all possible agglutinated words does not deliver quality results. We need to think about how to extend the prediction engine to deal with this kind of languages. This might become a meta bug as we'll probably need quite some engineering inputs plus localization inputs to finalize the feature.
Howie/Tim, it appears that I can't nominate feature-b2g. Could any of you help nominate this as a 3.0 feature? Thanks!
Done. Would you mark the dependencies as well please?
feature-b2g: --- → 3.0?
I did a quick sweep on bug 1112707's engineering bugs. Marked bugs here are either stated in comments as having agglutinative property, or are said as such in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Agglutinative_languages .
(In reply to John Lu [:mnjul] [MoCoTPE] from comment #3) > I did a quick sweep on bug 1112707's engineering bugs. Marked bugs here are > either stated in comments as having agglutinative property, or are said as > such in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Agglutinative_languages . Ah glad to see this has been added as a blocker for various languages. We pretty much can't do anything for Bantu languages (Xhosa, Zulu, Swahili, etc) without this support, some of these are highly agglutinative which might impact what we design here. Just flagging this so that we're aware that any prediction for African languages for partners is potentially impacted by this bug.
Thanks John for filing this. There are probably more than 250 *million* speakers of a Bantu language in Africa; it's incredibly important that Mozilla get this right - I've said to many people that I think Firefox OS wins on language more than anything else. I'd be happy to talk about technical solutions with the engineers that end up working on this.
I think this will probably be a long running feature considering the testing we'll need. I suggest we fork off the current Latin autocorrect engine and use the updated engine in this bug for the affected languages first. Is it possible to add some examples on to the bug so that we can begin to put together some patterns to cover this?
Hi Bruce, I'm discussing possible solutions with Friedel Wolff at the moment - we'll follow up here when we have more to say. I agree this will be a long-running feature, and indeed may require a whole new engine that gets us away from a word-list model.
Kevin, is the lead on this aspect now I would say. Can't add much more.
Hey Kevin, any update as per your comment 7?
We'll make a start on this at least during the upcoming work week.
Firefox OS is not being worked on
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Last Resolved: 10 months ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.