Closed
Bug 1139812
Opened 8 years ago
Closed 8 years ago
[Flame][Contacts]The contact is also deleted from ICE Contacts list when user deletes one phone number of the ICE Contact who has two phone numbers.
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Contacts, defect)
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:2.2+, b2g-v2.1 unaffected, b2g-v2.1S unaffected, b2g-v2.2 verified, b2g-master verified)
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
b2g-v2.1 | --- | unaffected |
b2g-v2.1S | --- | unaffected |
b2g-v2.2 | --- | verified |
b2g-master | --- | verified |
People
(Reporter: lixia, Assigned: hola)
References
Details
(Keywords: regression)
Attachments
(4 files)
[1.Description]: [Flame][v2.2&3.0][Contacts]The contact is also deleted from ICE Contacts list when user deletes the first phone number of ICE Contact which has two phone numbers in contact detail info. Found time:16:36 Attch:ICE_contact.MP4 and logcat_1636.txt. [2.Testing Steps]: 1. Set ICE Contacts in Contacts app. **Make sure that the ICE contacts have two phone numbers. 2. Open one ICE Contact and tap Edit icon. 3. Delete the first phone number (Important), then tap "Update". **The prompt "All the numbers are deleted.This contact is removed form the ICE Contacts." will pop up,then you can tap "OK",then the first phone number is deleted. [3.Expected Result]: 3.Only the first phone number is deleted and the contact is not deleted from ICE Contacts list. [4.Actual Result]: 3.The contact is also deleted from ICE Contacts list. [5.Reproduction build]: Flame 2.2 build: Build ID 20150304002529 Gaia Revision 8b4b3e4b7e7c308764f71542437fd60625ac6b75 Gaia Date 2015-03-03 15:01:17 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g37_v2_2/rev/2cb52b7cda5a Gecko Version 37.0 Device Name flame Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) eng.cltbld.20150304.042036 Firmware Date Wed Mar 4 04:20:47 EST 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0 Flame 3.0 build: Build ID 20150304010324 Gaia Revision 3fc0ac309f5fb0c1fe82c12223b955a4efce27e6 Gaia Date 2015-03-03 21:58:43 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c5b90c003be8 Gecko Version 39.0a1 Device Name flame Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) eng.cltbld.20150304.041952 Firmware Date Wed Mar 4 04:20:03 EST 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0 Flame 2.1 build: Build ID 20150304002212 Gaia Revision 7370d456a330882aa6c29cd5a6470b876038a622 Gaia Date 2015-03-03 19:44:19 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g34_v2_1/rev/81bbb1143b88 Gecko Version 34.0 Device Name flame Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) eng.cltbld.20150304.041213 Firmware Date Wed Mar 4 04:12:24 EST 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0 [6.Reproduction Frequency]: Always Recurrence,5/5 [7.TCID]: 14217 [8.Note]: If you delete the second phone number of the ICE Contact,only the second number is deleted and the contact still exists in ICE Conacts list.
Reporter | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
status-b2g-v2.1:
--- → unaffected
status-b2g-v2.1S:
--- → unaffected
status-b2g-v2.2:
--- → affected
status-b2g-master:
--- → affected
Reporter | ||
Comment 1•8 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•8 years ago
|
||
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•8 years ago
|
||
I can't repro this bug on 2.1S(512mb). 2.1S (512mb): Build ID 20150304001605 Gaia Revision a43d64ae01ef108aa4dcc971c770fecd8416a764 Gaia Date 2015-02-26 09:24:39 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g34_v2_1s/rev/fab8e3ef191f Gecko Version 34.0 Device Name scx15_sp7715ea Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) 122 Firmware Date Thu Feb 5 12:42:58 CST 2015
Comment 4•8 years ago
|
||
I remember this panel being introduced in 2.2. QA wanted to shoot a video of the behavior in 2.1.
Keywords: qawanted
Updated•8 years ago
|
QA Contact: bzumwalt
Comment 5•8 years ago
|
||
Youtube video showing behavior on Flame 2.1: http://youtu.be/nSbqhTA7yx4 Issue does not occur on Flame 2.1 First number is deleted, contact remains as ICE contact with no warning message. Device: Flame 2.1 Build ID: 20150305001708 Gaia: 89db88a76ae8363cd7f8e7a07d35ae24058aec36 Gecko: b64b3a28d459 Version: 34.0 (2.1) Firmware Version: v18D-1 User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Mobile; rv:34.0) Gecko/34.0 Firefox/34.0
Updated•8 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage?] → [QAnalyst-Triage+]
Flags: needinfo?(ktucker)
Comment 6•8 years ago
|
||
I checked on 2.1 [1], this panel doesn't exist even if you delete the last phone number. It was decided in bug 1061420. [Blocking Requested - why for this release]: New panel in 2.2 which doesn't work as a user would expect. [1] Build ID 20150227002636 Gaia Revision 5d3479fdd438412adee4452720856b6b771fe5cd Gaia Date 2015-02-25 18:20:09 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g34_v2_1/rev/0390c73a827b Gecko Version 34.0 Device Name flame Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) eng.cltbld.20141120.194707 Firmware Date Thu Nov 20 19:47:17 EST 2014 Bootloader L1TC00011880
Blocks: 1061420
blocking-b2g: --- → 2.2?
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → hola
Updated•8 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 8•8 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8575388 -
Flags: review?(jmcf)
Comment 9•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8575388 [details] [review] [gaia] ADLR-es:1139812 > mozilla-b2g:master more work is needed
Attachment #8575388 -
Flags: review?(jmcf)
Assignee | ||
Comment 10•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8575388 [details] [review] [gaia] ADLR-es:1139812 > mozilla-b2g:master Both comments solved, asking r? again. Thanks.
Attachment #8575388 -
Flags: review?(jmcf)
Comment 11•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8575388 [details] [review] [gaia] ADLR-es:1139812 > mozilla-b2g:master LGTM, but please take into account the comments I left on GH
Attachment #8575388 -
Flags: review?(jmcf) → review+
Updated•8 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 13•8 years ago
|
||
Pull request has landed in master: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/9fa6e19a288f71a4e3200a9eb1b3d7aeb92d00e3
Updated•8 years ago
|
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 8 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•8 years ago
|
Comment 14•8 years ago
|
||
Hei Adrian, can you request for 2.2 approval? Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(hola)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•8 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8575388 [details] [review] [gaia] ADLR-es:1139812 > mozilla-b2g:master [Approval Request Comment] [Bug caused by] (feature/regressing bug #): bug 1061420 [User impact] if declined: Confusing behavior when deleting a phone for a ICE contact. [Testing completed]: Manual testing, integration test added. [Risk to taking this patch] (and alternatives if risky): Low risk, small change. [String changes made]: None.
Flags: needinfo?(hola)
Attachment #8575388 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.2?
Updated•8 years ago
|
Attachment #8575388 -
Flags: approval-gaia-v2.2? → approval-gaia-v2.2+
Comment 16•8 years ago
|
||
v2.2: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/9d09c08ffcc285ed443e29e16e30798e7fd6582d
Comment 17•8 years ago
|
||
This problem is verified pass on latest build of Flame 2.2 and Flame3.0. Whether you delete the first, second or third phone number, the contact will not be deleted from ICE Contacts list. See attachment: Verify_video.MP4 Rate: 0/10 Flame 2.2 build: (Pass) Build ID 20150317162504 Gaia Revision 306772a58335ac4cad285d27c3805090a8cc6886 Gaia Date 2015-03-17 17:12:36 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g37_v2_2/rev/83251e534b33 Gecko Version 37.0 Device Name flame Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) eng.cltbld.20150317.195036 Firmware Date Tue Mar 17 19:50:45 EDT 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0 Flame 3.0 build: (Pass) Build ID 20150317073344 Gaia Revision 738987bd80b0ddb4ccf853855388c2627e19dcc1 Gaia Date 2015-03-17 02:27:51 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/008b3f65a7e0 Gecko Version 39.0a1 Device Name flame Firmware(Release) 4.4.2 Firmware(Incremental) eng.cltbld.20150317.111450 Firmware Date Tue Mar 17 11:15:00 EDT 2015 Bootloader L1TC000118D0
Updated•8 years ago
|
Status: RESOLVED → VERIFIED
QA Whiteboard: [QAnalyst-Triage+] → [QAnalyst-Triage+][MGSEI-Triage+]
Keywords: verifyme
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•