Closed
Bug 1140538
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
publish JSON feed of amo contents
Categories
(addons.mozilla.org Graveyard :: Public Pages, defect)
Tracking
(Not tracked)
RESOLVED
WORKSFORME
People
(Reporter: dherman, Unassigned)
Details
As mentioned in bug 1074960 comment 38, it would be good to have a standard published feed of the current contents of amo. In particular my `samo` tool needs to extract an amo index:
http://github.com/dherman/amo
Thanks,
Dave
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
If that tool currently only searches for specific strings, is there some reason you can't use the add-ons MXR tree?
Updated•10 years ago
|
Component: Operations: Marketplace → Public Pages
Product: Mozilla Services → addons.mozilla.org
QA Contact: operations-mkt
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
"Current contents" could cover rather a lot of things. We are rewriting AMO with an API in mind and if you are looking for add-ons data, as Kris says, using MXR makes sense.
Closing based on those changes unless you've got more feedback about what you are after.
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → WONTFIX
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
The Cuban community has been maintaining a mirror of the public contents of AMO for users whose bandwidth constraints prevent them from accessing them directly.
When we stopped mirroring our CDN data to FTP, I started manually maintaining a list of the latest public versions of add-ons and their download URLs. Since we migrated to AWS, I can't continue to update that list, so it would be really helpful if we could provide the data directly from AMO instead.
Something as simple as a cached JSON feed, updated once a day-ish, along the following lines should do:
{
"addons": {
"<slug>": {
"status": "<status>",
"url": "<url>",
"created": "<creation-time>",
"versions": {
"<latest-version-number>": {
"created": "<creation-time>",
"files": [
{
"created": "<creation-time>",
"status": "<status>",
"platform": "<platform>",
"filename": "<filename>",
"download_url": "<download-url>"
},
...
]
}
}
},
...
}
}
I was using something along the lines of the following to update the old list:
SELECT
a.id AS addon_id,
CONCAT('https://addons.mozilla.org/addon/', a.slug, '/') AS addon_url,
f.created AS file_created,
CASE f.platform_id
WHEN 0 THEN 'Any'
WHEN 1 THEN 'All'
WHEN 2 THEN 'Linux'
WHEN 3 THEN 'OS-X'
WHEN 4 THEN 'BSD'
WHEN 5 THEN 'WinNT'
WHEN 6 THEN 'Solaris'
WHEN 7 THEN 'Android'
WHEN 8 THEN 'Maemo'
ELSE '?'
END AS file_platform,
CONCAT('https://addons.cdn.mozilla.net/user-media/addons/', a.id, '/', f.filename) AS file_url
FROM
addons a
INNER JOIN
versions v ON a.current_version = v.id
INNER JOIN
files f ON f.version_id = v.id
WHERE
a.status IN (4, 8, 9) AND
NOT a.inactive AND
a.is_listed AND
((a.status IN (8, 9) AND f.status = 8) OR
(a.status = 4 AND f.status = 4))
ORDER BY
f.created DESC
;
But obviously I'd prefer an ORM-based solution for AMO code.
Status: RESOLVED → REOPENED
Resolution: WONTFIX → ---
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
There's an API: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/AMO/Add-ons_manager_API, there's are multiple RSS feeds: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/extensions/format:rss?sort=users - do those not provide the information needed?
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
I don't think that either of those allow someone to get a list of all of the add-ons on AMO. The add-on manager API definitely only returns add-ons with full review, and I'm pretty sure they both limit the number of results they'll return.
I see the solutions that @andym says but it not solved my problem beacuse the API only show the firts 10 approbed addo-ns, and the RSS channel.
The API provide the data that I need but with few addons.
I think that idea of @kmag is the best because return all data that I need, and I can develop an advanced system that update add-ons and let the WP installation.
Hi friends, it would be possible?
The timeline for signed add-ons has been scheduled to Firefox 46.
Flags: needinfo?(amckay)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Product: addons.mozilla.org → addons.mozilla.org Graveyard
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
We'll do this through the new API as noted in this bug on github: https://github.com/mozilla/addons-server/issues/1878.
Closing this issue, follow the github issue for more information. Making it worksforme because there isn't a resolved gofollowitongithub status.
Status: REOPENED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago → 9 years ago
Flags: needinfo?(amckay)
Resolution: --- → WORKSFORME
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Noting for the author and others that the APIs have landed and are now accessible, you should be able to search and paginate through all the add-ons on AMO to build out a list.
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•