Closed Bug 1152171 Opened 10 years ago Closed 10 years ago

Rename AnimationTimeline to DocumentTimeline

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

defect
Not set
normal

Tracking

()

RESOLVED FIXED
mozilla40
Tracking Status
firefox40 --- fixed

People

(Reporter: birtles, Assigned: birtles)

References

Details

(Keywords: dev-doc-needed)

Attachments

(3 files)

The Web Animations spec has been updated such that AnimationTimeline is now an abstract interface for representing potentially many different types of timelines. The concrete timeline used by default for CSS Animations etc., i.e. the document timeline, is called DocumentTimeline. We don't plan to implement other types of timelines yet but we should rename the existing names to match the spec for now.
Depends on: 1152619
The tests in dom/animation/tests/ use an old version of idlharness.js that doesn't support inherited interfaces. As discussed in bug 1152619 we're not looking at updating these old tests (under dom/imptests) at the moment which means we won't be able to update the IDL tests in dom/animation/tests/ to continue passing once we introduce DocumentTimeline as a subinterface of AnimationTimeline. As a result, this patch simply the removes the IDL tests for this interface from dom/animation/tests. However, we have a test for this interface in web-platform-tests where I've set up a pull request to apply the required renaming so we should eventually get test coverage for this renaming. https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1748 In the long run, all the tests in dom/animation/tests should end up in web-platform-tests. The main reason they aren't there yet is that most of them test the mapping between the Web Animations API and CSS and there's currently no spec defining that so there's no place to put them in the web-platform-tests repository. There are a few tests for animation timeline which could be landed in web-platform-tests (and then removed from dom/animation/tests) but we need to discuss with Google if this is the desired behavior or not first. For the time being I have a branch setup for that and I'm leaving the tests in dom/animation/tests so we continue to test what *we* think the behavior should be in the meantime. That branch is here: https://github.com/birtles/web-platform-tests/compare/rename-animation-timeline...birtles:add-hidden-iframe-tests
Attachment #8590624 - Flags: review?(james)
And then re-add AnimationTimeline has an abstract super-class of DocumentTimeline.
Attachment #8590627 - Flags: review?(bugs)
Until the renaming PR (https://github.com/w3c/web-platform-tests/pull/1748) lands upstream and we update, this test will fail.
Attachment #8590628 - Flags: review?(james)
Comment on attachment 8590624 [details] [diff] [review] part 1 - Remove AnimationTimeline IDL tests from dom/animation/tests Review of attachment 8590624 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- I think Ms2ger should review things in imptest
Attachment #8590624 - Flags: review?(james) → review?(Ms2ger)
Attachment #8590627 - Flags: review?(bugs) → review+
Attachment #8590628 - Flags: review?(james) → review+
Comment on attachment 8590624 [details] [diff] [review] part 1 - Remove AnimationTimeline IDL tests from dom/animation/tests Review of attachment 8590624 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- rs=me
Attachment #8590624 - Flags: review?(Ms2ger) → review+
Blocks: 1154615
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.

Attachment

General

Created:
Updated:
Size: