Closed
Bug 116311
Opened 24 years ago
Closed 24 years ago
page-loader test crashes with new profile
Categories
(Core :: XPCOM, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
DUPLICATE
of bug 117153
People
(Reporter: bstell, Assigned: scc)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(3 files)
when I create a new profile and run the page loader tests moz
crashes. I suspect this is a cache issue since it does not seem to happen
when I restart moz. I also believe I have seen this when I cleared cache.
![]() |
||
Comment 1•24 years ago
|
||
any chance of a stack? What build is this?
Reporter | ||
Comment 2•24 years ago
|
||
build 2001-12-20
FMR during display of http://www.mozilla.org/start
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•24 years ago
|
||
sorry I did not see see a core file
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•24 years ago
|
||
things seem to get really ill after this. Lots of error happen
Reporter | ||
Comment 5•24 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•24 years ago
|
||
->cache
Assignee: asa → gordon
Component: Browser-General → Networking: Cache
QA Contact: doronr → tever
I see no evidence connecting this bug with the cache. However, the free memory
read data should be looked into.
Assignee: gordon → asa
Component: Networking: Cache → Browser-General
QA Contact: tever → doronr
Comment 8•24 years ago
|
||
Does talkback (in a nightly build) catch this crash?
Comment 9•24 years ago
|
||
To answer Asa's question: it probably does show up in a talkback log, but the
stack in that case wouldn't mean much, since it is just a victim of the
corruption.
Thanks to bstell for getting those Solaris purify logs.
This is the crash that has been happening since Nov 27 IIRC in the pageloader
tests on btek. It does seem to only happen on the initial, clean cache run of
the test, which doesn't necessarily make it the cache, but the different code
path would appear to expose this corruption.
Coincidentally, dbaron modified nsSharedBufferHandle on Nov 27, which is
implicated in the second set of purify logs attached.
Comment 10•24 years ago
|
||
*** Bug 114281 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
It would be more likely to be the modifications I made that caused string
sharing to be used in a few places.
Could this be bug 112547? Or is it something simpler?
->String
Assignee: asa → scc
Component: Browser-General → String
QA Contact: doronr → jaggernaut
Comment 13•24 years ago
|
||
scc is on sabbatical -- who can help? jag? dbaron?
/be
Comment 14•24 years ago
|
||
The stack traces that are in bug 114281 are exactly like the ones that I'm
seeing on my machine at home. I'm not just seeing it in the page load tests,
either. I'm seeing it in mail, mostly since that's what I use most of the time.
I have a dual CPU machine which may make things worse. What is btek?
There's a possibility that this isn't strings, it's just that this shows up with
strings since there's where most of our allocation happens and is first to
stumble over the bug.
It would be really great if we could find a way to reproduce this easily.
Comment 15•24 years ago
|
||
btek is a dual-CPU machine, too.
My machine is also dual-CPU, and I don't see it.
Comment 17•24 years ago
|
||
dbaron, what compiler and linux install (assuming you're using linux?)
Comment 18•24 years ago
|
||
I'm starting to think that the PAC bug that I filed (bug 116311) is the same as
this.
I know that one of the problems with the PAC patch is that when it's loaded it
loads the plugin host, the RDF code and some charset code from a non-main
thread. This causes all kinds of assertions. I've added thread safety to those
classes that were asserting about being called from the wrong thread but this is
just spackling over the real problem.
Comment 19•24 years ago
|
||
http://bonsai.mozilla.org/cvsquery.cgi?treeid=default&module=all&branch=HEAD&branchtype=match&dir=&file=mozilla%2F&filetype=match&who=&whotype=match&sortby=Date&hours=2&date=explicit&mindate=11%2F25%2F2001+19%3A00%3A00&maxdate=11%2F28%2F2001+09%3A00%3A00&cvsroot=%2Fcvsroot
This bug appeared somewhere in this set of checkins. dbaron, there are shared
string changes in there.
I had to binary search for the bad build. Now I have to binary search the
checkins. Weeeee!!!
> dbaron, what compiler and linux install (assuming you're using linux?)
gcc 3.0.2 with -O2 and RH 7.2
Comment 21•24 years ago
|
||
Sorry, the PAC bug is bug 117153. I've got that crash down to a single checkin
by dbaron. I'll bet this bug is the same.
The PAC bug is relatively easy to reproduce, which is nice.
Hopefully this is fixed now, although it hasn't shown up as a problem on
tinderbox for at least a day or so anyway.
I'm going to dupe this since what I fixed matches bstell's purify log exactly
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 117153 ***
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 24 years ago
Resolution: --- → DUPLICATE
Updated•5 years ago
|
Component: String → XPCOM
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•