Last Comment Bug 11650 - RDF/XML specification violations
: RDF/XML specification violations
Status: NEW
: arch, meta
Product: Core
Classification: Components
Component: RDF (show other bugs)
: Trunk
: All All
: P3 normal with 11 votes (vote)
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody; OK to take it and work on it
:
:
Mentors:
http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/
Depends on: 15006 98392 106516 227309 231546 240877 268841 274068 306320 349969 32208 33196 33197 42991 227307 232623 466378
Blocks:
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 1999-08-11 12:42 PDT by Chris Waterson
Modified: 2013-04-03 00:23 PDT (History)
17 users (show)
See Also:
Crash Signature:
(edit)
QA Whiteboard:
Iteration: ---
Points: ---
Has Regression Range: ---
Has STR: ---


Attachments

Description Chris Waterson 1999-08-11 12:42:13 PDT
Meta-bug for tracking RDF/XML specification violations.
Comment 1 Paul MacQuiddy 1999-11-30 12:53:59 PST
blanking out qa contact
Comment 2 Chris Waterson 2000-06-09 09:25:36 PDT
-> mfuture
Comment 3 Jason Diamond 2000-08-27 14:35:23 PDT
RDF containers can only have rdf:ID attribute or be anonymous, they can not have
rdf:about. See RDF Spec 3.2 and 6. The XUL template mechanism only works when a
container has an rdf:about attribute which is illegal.
Comment 4 Chris Waterson 2000-08-28 10:52:55 PDT
Right, that's bug 32208.
Comment 5 Eric Murphy 2001-09-10 09:07:31 PDT
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-syntax-grammar-20010906/

This is for refactoring RDF/XML syntax. Very interesting, and maybe this could
be applied to Mozilla somehow. 

Basically, it makes RDF grammer more simple, but doesn't seem to break the
existing spec.
Comment 6 Axel Hecht 2004-04-19 12:25:39 PDT
waterson left the building

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.