Closed
Bug 1180132
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Android 2.3 / API 9 builds failing when RecyclerView is used
Categories
(Firefox Build System :: Android Studio and Gradle Integration, defect)
Firefox Build System
Android Studio and Gradle Integration
Unspecified
Android
Tracking
(firefox42 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla42
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox42 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: sebastian, Assigned: sebastian)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
Bug 1171288 added the ability to build with RecyclerView. However a try run [1] for the first feature using RecyclerView (Bug 1176207) revealed that Android 2.3 / API 9 builds fail "error: package android.support.v7.widget does not exist".
Either the build changes do not affect builds for Android 2.3 or we are later excluding these files from the build.
[1] https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=71912f4d2238
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
The RecyclerView library is defined in android.m4 inside the block of $MOZ_NATIVE_DEVICES. That's obviously wrong. It should be included regardless of $MOZ_NATIVE_DEVICES being set.
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
Bug 1180132 - android.m4: RecyclerView library should not be dependent on flag $MOZ_NATIVE_DEVICES. r?nalexander
Attachment #8629392 -
Flags: review?(nalexander)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8629392 [details]
MozReview Request: Bug 1180132 - android.m4: RecyclerView library should not be dependent on flag $MOZ_NATIVE_DEVICES. r?nalexander
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/12605/#review11069
Ship It!
Attachment #8629392 -
Flags: review?(nalexander) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 42
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Firefox for Android → Firefox Build System
Target Milestone: Firefox 42 → mozilla42
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•