Closed Bug 1183450 Opened 9 years ago Closed 9 years ago

"Assertion failure: callback.mFound (Cycle collection participant didn't traverse to preserved wrapper! This will probably crash.)"

Categories

(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)

Product:
Core
Component:
DOM: Core & HTML
Type:
defect
Priority:
Not set
Severity:
critical

Tracking

()

Status:
RESOLVED FIXED
Milestone:
mozilla42
Tracking Flags:
Tracking Status
firefox39 --- unaffected
firefox40 --- unaffected
firefox41 --- unaffected
firefox42 --- fixed
firefox-esr31 --- unaffected
firefox-esr38 --- unaffected
b2g-v2.0 --- unaffected
b2g-v2.0M --- unaffected
b2g-v2.1 --- unaffected
b2g-v2.1S --- unaffected
b2g-v2.2 --- unaffected
b2g-v2.2r --- unaffected
b2g-master --- fixed

People

(Reporter: jruderman, Assigned: smaug)

References

Details

(4 keywords, Whiteboard: [post-critsmash-triage][b2g-adv-main2.5-])

Attachments

(3 files)

testcase
115 bytes, text/html
Details
stack
10.34 KB, text/plain
Details
patch
1.55 KB, patch
baku
: review+
Details | Diff | Splinter Review
Attached file testcase — 
Assertion failure: callback.mFound (Cycle collection participant didn't traverse to preserved wrapper! This will probably crash.), at dom/base/nsWrapperCache.cpp:127

This must be a recent regression, since the assertion dates back to 2009:
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/5361d44863ed
Group: core-security
Attached file stack — 

    
    

    
  
Regression from bug 1177916 maybe?
Flags: needinfo?(amarchesini)

    
    

    
  
Yes. Huh, I did a horrible review there.
Blocks: 1177916
Assignee: nobody → bugs

    
    

    
  

      
      
      
      

        Attached patch
          
          
        patch
        — 
          — Splinter Review
      

    


  

        Attachment #8633450 -
        Flags: review?(amarchesini)

    
    

    
  
Comment on attachment 8633450 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

Review of attachment 8633450 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

I was submitting exactly the same patch.

        Attachment #8633450 -
        Flags: review?(amarchesini) → review+

    
    

    
  
FYI, I'm writing a patch for bug 1183604 to catch this kind of silly mistakes more likely.
Flags: needinfo?(amarchesini)
Flags: in-testsuite?

    
    

    
  
This will eventually get tested by bug 1183604, so I don't think we need a separate test.
Flags: in-testsuite? → in-testsuite-

    
  
Group: core-security → core-security-release
Whiteboard: [post-critsmash-triage]
Group: core-security-release
Whiteboard: [post-critsmash-triage] → [post-critsmash-triage][b2g-adv-main2.5-]
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML

          You need to log in
          before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
        






  

    
  







  

    

      
Attachment

      

      
      
      
      
    

    

      

        

          

            
General

            

              Creator: 



            

            
Created: 

            
Updated: 

            
Size: