1206025 - [UX][TV][2.5][Fennec side] Fennec spec for seamless experience

Status: RESOLVED FIXED

(Firefox for Android Graveyard :: General, defect, P1)

Description

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

This is UX bug for Fennec side spec of seamless experience.

Comment 1

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

Hi Anthony,
This is UX bug for holding Seamless experience spec of Fennec side.
FYR.

Comment 2

[Anthony Lam (:antlam) Find me, @antlam on Slack!]

Thanks!

Comment 3

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

Hi Anthony, Would you provide a finalized spec for

Comment 4

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

Hi Anthony,
Would you provide Fennec side spec of Cast Video/SendTab or we should just use the one from Tori?
Thanks!

Comment 5

[Anthony Lam (:antlam) Find me, @antlam on Slack!]

Wanted to clarify - What part are you referring to? are you looking for visual/UI specs or more of a UX flow? 

I think Margaret was going to make a prototype (please correct me if I'm remembering wrong!) that should be "to spec", at least from a UI/UX point of view. 

Margaret?

Comment 6

[:Margaret Leibovic]

I built a "dummy" add-on to demonstrate the add-on UX that we discussed. You can install it from this page to try it out:
http://people.mozilla.org/~mleibovic/fxostv/install.html

I put the code here:
https://github.com/leibovic/fennec-fxos-tv

I don't think we need detailed UX specs, since there's not much flexibility to change how things look with an add-on (the add-on APIs guarantee the visual changes will be "to spec").

Comment 7

[Anthony Lam (:antlam) Find me, @antlam on Slack!]

That's what I'm thinking too. Josh, does this work for you?

Comment 8

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

(In reply to Anthony Lam (:antlam) from comment #7)
> That's what I'm thinking too. Josh, does this work for you?
Hi Anthony, Hi Margaret,
TOri just replied by mail:

"Cast video to FFOS TV” : 
     We don't need spec for this as you mentioned there's not much flexibility here.

"Send to FFOS TV”, “Remote Control": 
     Tori will provide spec for add-on and may need your feedback. Do you usually need to review UX spec for add-on?

Comment 9

[Anthony Lam (:antlam) Find me, @antlam on Slack!]

Josh,

Sure. As an aside, I'm less concerned about the "remote control" aspect here. 

For everything else, I strongly recommend you guys pick up where Margaret left off in comment 6. As she mentioned, that should contain our agreed upon UX and UI "spec" already.

Comment 10

[Shih-Chiang Chien [:schien] (UTC+8) (use ni? plz)]

I found it's not possible to create a media control UI in Fennec add-on. Therefore, we'll only implement "Send to FFOS TV", "Remote Control" in add-on.

"Cast video to FFOS TV" will be integrated in Fennec UI as in bug 1129785.

Comment 11

[Josh Cheng [:josh]]

Hi Tori,
Can you make sure the spec is updated as current implementation by SC and Jimmy?
Thanks

Comment 12

[Tori Chen [:tori]]

UX had checked the implementation previously.