Closed
Bug 1217602
Opened 10 years ago
Closed 10 years ago
remove nsIPKIParamBlock
Categories
(Core :: Security: PSM, defect)
Core
Security: PSM
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla44
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox44 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: keeler, Assigned: keeler)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
nsIPKIParamBlock is unnecessary.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 1•10 years ago
|
||
bug 1217602 - remove nsIPKIParamBlock
nsIPKIParamBlock was unnecessary.
Attachment #8677711 -
Flags: review?(cykesiopka.bmo)
Comment 2•10 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8677711 [details]
MozReview Request: bug 1217602 - remove nsIPKIParamBlock
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/23003/#review20671
Wow, unnecessary indeed.
::: security/manager/pki/nsNSSDialogHelper.cpp:12
(Diff revision 1)
> -#include "nsIInterfaceRequestorUtils.h"
> +#include "nsNSSDialogHelper.h"
Nit: If I'm reading https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#CC_practices right, this should stay where it is, but separated into its own block.
::: security/manager/pki/nsNSSDialogs.cpp:403
(Diff revision 1)
> + }
Nit: A blank line after this probably helps readability.
Attachment #8677711 -
Flags: review?(cykesiopka.bmo) → review+
| Assignee | ||
Comment 3•10 years ago
|
||
https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/23003/#review20671
Thanks for the review!
> Nit: If I'm reading https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Coding_Style#CC_practices right, this should stay where it is, but separated into its own block.
Yep - good catch.
> Nit: A blank line after this probably helps readability.
Good call.
| Assignee | ||
Comment 4•10 years ago
|
||
Comment 6•10 years ago
|
||
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 10 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla44
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•