Closed
Bug 1228080
Opened 7 years ago
Closed 7 years ago
Split the animation-inspector's components into multiple files
Categories
(DevTools :: Inspector: Animations, defect)
DevTools
Inspector: Animations
Tracking
(firefox46 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
Firefox 46
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox46 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: pbro, Assigned: nchevobbe)
References
Details
Attachments
(1 file, 3 obsolete files)
92.62 KB,
patch
|
nchevobbe
:
review+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
/devtools/client/animationinspector/components.js This file is growing quickly. It contains all the UI components for the animation-inspector. We should split it in several files and move them to a new components directory.
Reporter | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Component: Developer Tools: Inspector → Developer Tools: Animation Inspector
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•7 years ago
|
||
I'm gonna take a look at this. Can someone assign it to me please ?
Reporter | ||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → chevobbe.nicolas
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
I added one file for each exported class in components.js . I ran the tests ( ./mach test devtools/client/animationinspector/test/* ) and they all passed. I hope I got it right, feel free to tell me what could be done better.
Attachment #8704256 -
Flags: review?(pbrosset)
Reporter | ||
Comment 3•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8704256 [details] [diff] [review] Bug_1228080.patch Review of attachment 8704256 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Awesome work, that's going to make the code a lot easier to navigate, thanks for working on this. I'm generally very happy with the changes and would like to R+ it. I just have a series of really minor formatting comments (which you can avoid next time if you setup eslint locally (https://wiki.mozilla.org/DevTools/CodingStandards to have it locally in your editor, and './mach eslint --setup' to install the right plugins and './mach eslint' to run it from the command line). Also, I'd like TimeScale to be moved to utils.js instead of as a component. ::: devtools/client/animationinspector/components/animation-details.js @@ +154,5 @@ > + */ > +function getCssPropertyName(jsPropertyName) { > + return jsPropertyName.replace(/[A-Z]/g, "-$&").toLowerCase(); > +} > +exports.getCssPropertyName = getCssPropertyName; \ No newline at end of file nit: Please add an empty line at the end of this file. ::: devtools/client/animationinspector/components/animation-target-node.js @@ +316,5 @@ > + } > + > + this.emit("target-retrieved"); > + }) > +}; \ No newline at end of file nit: Please add an empty line at the end of this file. ::: devtools/client/animationinspector/components/animation-time-block.js @@ +1,5 @@ > +"use strict"; > + > +const {Cu} = require("chrome"); > +Cu.import("resource://devtools/client/shared/widgets/ViewHelpers.jsm"); > +const {Task} = Cu.import("resource://gre/modules/Task.jsm", {}); Task isn't used in this module, please remove this import. @@ +152,5 @@ > + // Older servers don't send the type. > + return state.type > + ? L10N.getFormatStr("timeline." + state.type + ".nameLabel", state.name) > + : state.name; > +} \ No newline at end of file nit: Please add an empty line at the end of this file. ::: devtools/client/animationinspector/components/animation-timeline.js @@ +1,3 @@ > +"use strict"; > + > +const {Cu} = require("chrome"); Cu isn't used here, please remove this require. ::: devtools/client/animationinspector/components/keyframes.js @@ +66,5 @@ > + value: e.target.getAttribute("title"), > + x: e.target.offsetLeft + e.target.closest(".frames").offsetLeft > + }); > + } > +}; \ No newline at end of file nit: Please add an empty line at the end of this file. ::: devtools/client/animationinspector/components/rate-selector.js @@ +91,5 @@ > + } > + } > +}; > + > +let sortedUnique = arr => [...new Set(arr)].sort((a, b) => a > b); \ No newline at end of file nit: Please add an empty line at the end of this file. ::: devtools/client/animationinspector/components/time-scale.js @@ +17,5 @@ > + * For the helper to know how to convert, it needs to know all the animations. > + * Whenever a new animation is added to the panel, addAnimation(state) should be > + * called. reset() can be called to start over. > + */ > +var TimeScale = { So TimeScale is actually not a UI component, it's more of a helper object that UI components use to know how wide some widget should be in the timeline. I think we should take the opportunity of this bug to move it to utils.js instead.
Attachment #8704256 -
Flags: review?(pbrosset)
Assignee | ||
Comment 4•7 years ago
|
||
Sorry for the formatting, I thought I had eslint turned on but it seems that Bug 1229858 messed with my node version. I moved Timescale to util.js and ran the tests again, which all passed.
Attachment #8704256 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8704341 -
Flags: review?(pbrosset)
Assignee | ||
Comment 5•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8704341 [details] [diff] [review] Bug_1228080.patch My bad, the time-scale.js file is not removed from this patch. I'll post a fixed one later
Attachment #8704341 -
Flags: review?(pbrosset)
Assignee | ||
Comment 6•7 years ago
|
||
Here's the fixed patch
Attachment #8704341 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8704360 -
Flags: review?(pbrosset)
Reporter | ||
Comment 7•7 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8704360 [details] [diff] [review] Patch without time-scale.js and with correct formatting Review of attachment 8704360 [details] [diff] [review]: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Nice. Thanks. I don't remember, do you have TRY push access? If so, please push to try, otherwise let me know, I'll do it for you. Also, please amend the commit message to include the "; r=pbro" suffix.
Attachment #8704360 -
Flags: review?(pbrosset) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 8•7 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8704360 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8704364 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 9•7 years ago
|
||
I don't think I have access to TRY. I tried to push using commands from https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseEngineering/TryServer but all I get is remote: Permission denied (publickey).
Reporter | ||
Comment 10•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nicolas Chevobbe from comment #9) > I don't think I have access to TRY. I tried to push using commands from > https://wiki.mozilla.org/ReleaseEngineering/TryServer but all I get is > remote: Permission denied (publickey). Ok, so you don't have access. If you intend to contribute more in the future, you should consider requesting access by reading through https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/commit/access-policy/ and https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/commit/ In the meantime, I've pushed this patch to try: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=4510ed019be6
Assignee | ||
Comment 11•7 years ago
|
||
Hi Patrick, thank you for pushing it. The job is completed. There are 6 failed tests, but I'm not sure if it's due to my patch. I filed Bug 1237302 to gain access to TRY. May you vouch for me ? Thank you.
Reporter | ||
Comment 12•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Nicolas Chevobbe from comment #11) > Hi Patrick, thank you for pushing it. > The job is completed. There are 6 failed tests, but I'm not sure if it's due > to my patch. Yep, those are unrelated. Let's ask for check this patch in. > I filed Bug 1237302 to gain access to TRY. May you vouch for me ? Done.
Keywords: checkin-needed
Reporter | ||
Comment 14•7 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM] from comment #13) > This patch doesn't apply. Please rebase. Hm, weird, I've tried applying the patch on latest fx-team and it worked fine. Nicolas, can you re-apply your patch on latest fx-team when you get a chance and merge if needed.
Flags: needinfo?(chevobbe.nicolas)
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•7 years ago
|
||
I was working on mozilla-central so I had to clone fx-team ( I was told on IRC that I should work on the latest, so will I ). I apply the patch to fx-team ( hg import with and without --no-commit ), and had no errors. I did not launched the tests ( because I have to ./mach build and it takes an hour and a half on my laptop ), but I don't really know what's going on. Ryan, can you explain me more in detail the error you got ? Maybe I'm not applying the patch as it should be ?
Flags: needinfo?(chevobbe.nicolas) → needinfo?(ryanvm)
Comment 16•7 years ago
|
||
$ hg import -e bz://1228080 applying bz://1228080 Fetching... done Parsing... done patching file devtools/client/animationinspector/test/unit/test_getCssPropertyName.js Hunk #1 FAILED at 1 1 out of 1 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file devtools/client/animationinspector/test/unit/test_getCssPropertyName.js.rej abort: patch failed to apply That's on fx-team tip.
Flags: needinfo?(ryanvm)
Assignee | ||
Comment 17•7 years ago
|
||
Ryan, I pulled and update and tried : $hg import -e https://bug1228080.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi\?id\=8704364 applying https://bug1228080.bmoattachments.org/attachment.cgi?id=8704364 ( I didn't found anything on your cool bz:// syntax, what's that ? ) And that's it, my editor showed up with the commit message, and everything seems fine. Patrick, maybe you could try to apply the patch again, as you will know better what's going on ?
Comment 19•7 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0c13e28343dd
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 7 years ago
status-firefox46:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → Firefox 46
Comment 20•7 years ago
|
||
[bugday-20160323] Status: RESOLVED,FIXED -> UNVERIFIED Comments: STR: Not clear. Developer specific testing Component: Name Firefox Version 46.0b9 Build ID 20160322075646 Update Channel beta User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:46.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/46.0 OS Windows 7 SP1 x86_64 Expected Results: Developer specific testing Actual Results: As expected
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Firefox → DevTools
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•