1228587 - [Settings] Add-on dialog does not correctly list "Affected Apps"

Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 1224985

(Firefox OS Graveyard :: Gaia::Settings, defect)

Description

[Christiane Ruetten [INACTIVE]]

Attachment: Screenshot showing missing list of "Affected Apps"

An experimental add-on with the following manifest.json was side-loaded through WebIDE:

{
  "manifest_version": 2,
  "name": "Limpet",
  "description": "Attaches to apps and logs their behavior.",
  "version": "0.1.9",
  "role": "addon",
  "author": "Christiane Ruetten",

  "icons": {
    "128": "/icons/icon128x128.png"
  },

  "permissions": [
    "notifications"
  ],

  "applications": {
    "gecko": {
      "id": "[e-mail]"
    }
  },

  "background": {
    "persistent": true,
    "scripts": ["/js/manager.js"]
  },

  "content_scripts": [
    {
      "matches": ["app://system.gaiamobile.org/index.html"],
      "js": ["/js/system.js"]
    },
    {
      "matches": ["<all_urls>"],
      "js": ["/js/injector.js"]
    }
  ]
}

Expected result:
* Add-on settings dialog shows a list of affected apps (every app in this case).

Actual result:
* Add-on settings dialog shows "This add-on does not affect any installed apps."

Comment 1

[Christiane Ruetten [INACTIVE]]

In fact, I am seeing this bug for every add-on even when installed from Marketplace. Device is Foxfood on the 2.6.0 nightly channel, build ID 20151112013420.

STR:
- Visit https://marketplace.firefox.com/debug on device
- Enable "Always show Add-ons"
- Install "System - Draggable Home Button"
- Check Add-on settings

Expected result:
* Add-on settings dialog shows a list of affected apps (every app in this case).

Actual result:
* Add-on settings dialog shows "This add-on does not affect any installed apps."

Comment 2

[Christiane Ruetten [INACTIVE]]

Correction:

Expected result:
* Add-on settings dialog shows a list of affected apps (>>>System app<<< in this case).

Comment 3

[Christiane Ruetten [INACTIVE]]

A different device with 2.6.0-prerelease 20151023101519 does not exhibit this bug.

Comment 4

[Christiane Ruetten [INACTIVE]]

Possible regressions from Bug 1196386. Fixed in Bug 1217741?

Comment 5

[Frederik Braun [:freddy]]

(In reply to Christiane Ruetten [:cr] from comment #3)
> A different device with 2.6.0-prerelease 20151023101519 does not exhibit
> this bug.

2.5.0-prerelease :>

Comment 6

[Michael Henretty [:mikehenrty][:mhenretty]]

Yura, looks like this is happening again. Can you take a look and see what's happening?

Comment 7

[Christiane Ruetten [INACTIVE]]

Sorry for the confusion. This looks like a duplicate of bug 1224985 which didn't get much love so far.

Comment 8

[Yura Zenevich [:yzen] (please use "needinfo")]

(In reply to Michael Henretty [:mhenretty] from comment #6)
> Yura, looks like this is happening again. Can you take a look and see what's
> happening?

Replied in bug 1224985